My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11/04/04
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2000's
>
2004
>
11/04/04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2025 3:56:24 PM
Creation date
12/3/2004 12:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
11/04/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
indicated the applicant has also committed to constructing an 8-foot high privacy fence around <br />the perimeter of the parcel, including the area where the applicant is deficient in the required <br />buffer yard depth. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler noted that City ordinances do not require a fence to be incorporated <br />into a buffer yard. She stated in this instance, Staff feels that a privacy fence will better buffer <br />the neighborhood than 60 feet of open space. She indicated that based on the unusual shape of <br />the property, site design considerations, and the proposed use of the property, Staff recommends <br />approval of the request for variance for a lesser bufferyard. <br /> <br />Public Input <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what was adjacent to this property on the north. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated it is single-family lots. <br /> <br />Board Member Brauer indicated when they had a hearing on this before he remembers someone <br />had a daycare, and he believes an 8-foot fence would improve the situation for that homeowner. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated they are proposing an 8-foot cedar privacy fence rather than just <br />a chain link fence. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if this was the minimum the applicant could go with their request for a <br />variance. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that given all the discussion on the cul-de-sac, the applicant <br />would have to significantly change their site plan to get more than 30 feet. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Shepherd to close the public hearing at <br />7:13 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Shepherd, Brauer, and Watson. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Board Members Jeffrey, Johnson and Van Scoy. <br /> <br />Commission Input <br /> <br />Board Member Brauer stated he is wondering if the applicant could put trees on the north side of <br />the fence. <br /> <br />Troy Livgard, representing TSM Development, indicated the fence is five feet off the property <br />line so the owner can maintain and mow the lawn without trespassing on the neighboring <br />properties, tte indicated it is possible they could move it another five feet and put some trees on <br />the outside. <br /> <br />Board of Adjustment/November 4, 2004 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.