Comp Plan 1974-1977 FILE #1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

June 30, !977 Planning Commission Page 2 kJl~ .llsalc~.$u~, CorlsLllting Engineers Diversified, Inc., explaiHed that the proposed Suw~.qe I)i~;i~)su/ Sy.~;t(:ms Ordinance would establish a policy relating to Ramsey cii;izm~s i'ar individual sewage disposal. The proposed ordinance also gives cotisi;l,l!c'Li()~l requi reii/e~lts. lle exl)ln'i~ed Lt~at the major difference between this and other septic tank ordinances i:-~ Ll~u.i: it ~'eq~i;"es an i~ispection, done by the City, of new work as well as o'i all ira<:!< wurl.'. ~!one e,~r'l'iur to see that an existing system is operating properly. A~d ,:,~u;o~ily,, ~,vury 'i.:wa years all septic tanks are inspected again. If at that time i;he s.y'_:,i;eul d(~ms i~oi; meet the specifications o'F the ordinance, the owner wi']'l I~e d'i:ucLu~} t,:)huw~' the rani< I)Ulnped. It was explained that the inspection portion oi- i;ite ordinunce wo~lld not go into effect until the City could establish the Mr. I.'sak~=;.:~ (:xi)lai~:d ttlat the proposed amendment to the Subdivision ordinance p~.~)vi~ies 'i,~r Lhe physical procedure of evaluating a particular area for approval as sites i'or individual SeVr/age disposal systems. i,ir. (iiaiuec ca I 'l ecl 'For input t:rom citizens present. i,~ar~e /\~du','sei~ 622.~$ Rivlyn Avenue, wanted to know if this was the official hearing oi? Nle Zuilill!~ [)rdi~llI~ce atld Mr. Gamec said that it was. Mr. Anderson asked how many b, oi] a cot~y u-F 'Liu.: $)ning ordinance and Mr. Gamec explained that s summary of (hanges was aL i:l~ ~ioar. lie explained that unless someone went to the City Hall they did il()L ~e 'Lf~e ei~ti~'e thing because it was 47 pages long. Mr. Anderson asl<ed 'if it ~ee.d~:d pul>lisI~i~lg :.n~d Attorney Goodrich said not until it was passed. M'r'. /\n~el,;oJ~ wani:e~! to I<now how much of the City is being rezoned and wanted i.o be si~(:,./rl on a mai). /\ttorlley Goodrich showed him on a map what was different thal~ that ~lei~ic'i:<xt~ wl~ai: was still the same and how it was changed and where. known his disagreement with the proposed policy regarding Iio I)rul. ifillL ll~ i;Ile 'Fact ~;t~ u the map was in error showing some o'F tile areas in the Ci y. Ilu _~,1~[ ..... e_l concern that if this plan goes through and is passed acco/aing Lo Lhe n'u~I) which 'is in mrror, it is still final and he wants to know what can be duud:'ich ext)'laine(I that 'it was not intended to rezone anything in tt-~ area ~r.,:,o~ is U~'ll<ing aboLli] (which is within the critical area and some of wi'Id ~rea) and if there is an error, it wil'l be amended. i,ir'~ /~, i~e~,.x,~ ua'id 'Lllat ii: we are adopting an ordinance geared to this map~ we ai'e in i:'oul]ie~ I~lli: ii" ad~]ptinU according to legal description, okay. Attorr~ey Goodi"ich s~id 'i;lutt i:l~e Planning Comr, ission's Findings of Fact will define this 'legal descrip: · L i 6756 l~iv-lyn Avenue, brought up that it was rnentioned 'Five year's: ago was in error and is recorded in the minutes that it is. lie agr[~es umu'li part o'F the mai), but said that they have been fighting 'For fiYe Ix:~r warehm ~se that was built in a residential area because they were i,e~'l,,'iL to I)u-i'ld. l,i'r'~ t",'~e ~.;~ :;IX~<:i'i"iualiy requested that the legal description adopted in -the ','cv'oni~!] l,r~:v'ious'ly be adopted 'in this change if there is going to be a chang(,.° t!L'ix)i'lluy Cua~ll"ici~ said that he thinks this request could be honored because