Laserfiche WebLink
- 11- <br /> <br />construction of the lower reaches of the CAB through <br />Champlin and Brooklyn Park by 1981. This lower stretch <br />of the interceptor through Champlin and Brooklyn Park <br />would phase out the Anoka Treatment Plant by carrying <br />the wastewater flow south through other existing <br />interceptors and ultimately to the Metropolitan Waste- <br />water Treatment Plant at Pig's Eye. The Anoka .upper <br />segment of the CAB will be sized for eventual service <br />to Ramsey when the lower reach of the CAB is constructed. <br />A major reason for this delay is that Anoka Treatment Plant <br />has limited reserve capacity, and first priority for allocation <br />of this capacity is given to the City of-Anoka. ~ Anoka is a ' <br />designated Freestanding Growth City and considered part <br />of the current Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Further- <br />more, expansion of the MetropOlitan Urban Service Area <br />to provide additional land for urban development demand <br />in 'the North Minneapolis sector is not needed until the <br />1980's. Therefore, Ramsey should not plan to become <br />part of the MUSA until metropolitan sewer service is <br />available.. At the earliest, this Will be 1981. -' , ' .--' <br /> <br />The Transition and Rural Areas <br /> <br />Ramsey's proposed Transition Area includes approximately <br />5,000 acres of developable land or about 8 square miles. <br />The proposed Rural Area includes about 4,000 acres or 6 <br />square miles. The development, policy is similar for each <br />area -- a 5 acre minimum lot size and overall density of <br />4 housing units per 40 acres. In addition, within the <br />Transition Area, lots would be designed for fUture <br />re subdivision when municipal water and sewer is available <br />(after .1990) by requiring a minimum lot width of 300 feet. <br /> <br />Within the Transition and Rural Areas, there are approxi- <br />mately 750 existing platted lots of 1+ acre in size. The <br />plan does not clearly state what development policy will <br />apply to these platted lots. It appears that these lots <br />could be developed at any time because the City has <br />assumed these lots would accommodate part of the <br />anticipated 1990 population growth. At 3.5 persons/ <br />household, this means that some 2,625 persons are <br />anticipated to locate within the Transition and Rural Area. <br />Whether the proposed density policy of 4 households per 40 <br />acres will apply to these existing lots is not clear. <br /> <br /> <br />