My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comp Plan 1978-1980 FILE #2
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1970-1979
>
Comp Plan 1978-1980 FILE #2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 9:33:25 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 2:36:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Engineering
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- 2 <br /> <br />Sludge processing is currently accomplished by anaerobic digestion. Ultimate sludge disposal <br />is either hauled to the Metropolitan Plant interceptor system or land spreading depending on <br />various environmental factors. Currently the MWCC is examining ultimate disposal of sludge <br />from each of its treatment plants. However, no recommendations regarding the future handling <br />of sludge have been made for the Anoka facility. <br /> <br />The current NPDES permit is for secondary treatment. Based on the modeling for the <br />Mississippi River, which was not available at the time of the previous studies,secondary treat- <br />ment for the Anoka service area is adequate to meet the proposed water quality standards. <br /> <br />The plant is currently in compliance with its NPDES permit. Also with EPA's new position on <br />pretreatment of industrial wastes, to eliminate the discharge of heavy metals, toxics or <br />potential toxic materials from industries, coming in the near future, the affect from the <br /> <br />Anoka discharge on the Minneapolis water intake will be insignificant even at periods of <br /> <br />low flow in the river. Also Federal Cartridge who was the primary discharger of metals to <br />the Anoka plant has undertaken a program to clean up its discharge to acceptable levels. <br /> <br />Champlin <br /> <br />The current river crossing from Champlin to Anoka is not adequate 'to serve the entire <br />population of Champlin therefore a new river crossing has been proposed as part of the <br />alternative to treat the future flows in Anoka. Also there has been documented cases of <br />septic tank failures in the central and southern portion of Champlin which must be corrected. <br /> <br />Metropolitan Plant <br /> <br />Deatails regarding the Metropolitan Plant Will be discussed with the central study area <br />portion of this plan. The discussion here will cover the existing interceptor system which <br />serves the cities located in this study area. <br /> <br />Andover <br /> <br />There is adequate sewer service to the city for its expected growth through the year 2000 in' <br />the Coon Rapids interceptor. However, a small portion of the City in the Rum River watershed <br />is receiving service by pumping flows back into this interceptor. When an outlet for Ramsey <br />is provided in northern Anoka,capacity for this section of Andover will also be designed. <br /> <br />~aple Grove <br /> <br />There is adequate capacity in the existing metropolitan system to accommodate the projected <br />flows from Maple Grove throughout the planning period. However, if development occurs in the <br />Elm Creek watershed the City would be required to pump the flows back into the existing .~ystem. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.