My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comp Plan 1978-1980 FILE #2
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1970-1979
>
Comp Plan 1978-1980 FILE #2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2018 9:33:25 AM
Creation date
12/9/2004 2:36:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Engineering
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Brooklyn Park <br /> <br />There is also adequate capacity in the interceptor system serving Brooklyn Park t_hrcug~' <br />the end of the planning period. <br /> <br />A few general comments regarding the existing metropolitan interceptor system is warranted. <br /> <br />The interceptors serving Andover, Brooklyn Park and Maple Grove all. converge on the <br /> <br />Minneapolis east interceptor. This sewer serves part of the combined sewer area in <br />Minneapolis. Mirkneapolis in the past several years has been separating the majority of the <br />combined sewers tributary to the Minneapolis east interceptor. However, ~here are still <br />combined sewered areas which drain to the Minneapolis east interceptor. Du~inq the periods <br />of rain or snow melt ~his sewer overflows combined sewage to the river. From ~te Minneapolis <br />east interceptor flow goes through the joint interceptor. There are no overflows on the <br />joint interceptor u/~til it reaches the treatment plant where all flows above the plant capacity <br />are bypassed. <br /> <br />By increasing sanitary sewage from future growth in this area will increase the amount of <br />flow being overflowed or bypassed to the river and the strength of 'these Overflow~.- There- <br />fore, for purposes of this study one of the alternatives being considered is to build a new <br />treatment plant in Fridle¥ and locate the outfall below St. Anthony F~lls. This outfall <br />location was chosen to.avoid a discharge to the Mirineapolis water supply intake. Preliminary <br />model indication is that secondary treatment is adequate to meet water quality standards. <br /> <br />The MWCC, as part of its 201 study, is looking at the whole question of combined sewer <br />overflows. A final decision on the sever.ity of the problem or Se alternatives is not <br />available. This report should be available in 1979 and the.results will be incorporated <br />into the Waste Management Policy Plan at that tame. <br /> <br />The preliminary results of the (AESOP) river model have shown that tertiary treatment at <br />the Metropolitan Plant is needed to meet water quality standards. The AESOP model is a <br />three dimensional model wh£ch has been calibrated as part of this study so load allocations <br />for the treatment facilities on the river could be determined. A detailed discussion re- <br />garding the findings of the model will be made in the study on modeling. The prelimiaa~f <br />results of ~he model showed that the Metropolitan Plant e~fluent of 15 mg/1 BCD and 1.5 <br />mg/1 anm~onia was needed to meet the proposed water quality standards. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.