Comp Plan 1978-1980 FILE #2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

same as the costs for the interceptor. This is only a rough estimate since the flows are but not as great or even =he direction of the flow the same/for comparison purposes this is felt to be adequate. Anoka, chamDlin and Ramsev Cost in Millions of Dollars Alternative Interceptor Treatment* Total Local 1 (Anoka plant) 2.023 5.25'6 7.279 5.907 2 (CAB) 8.617 1.502 10.119 -- __ 3 (Fridley) 8.617 11'.401 20.018 -- 4 (Land Disposal) 2.023 9.156 11.179 5.907 * Includes both construction costs and operation and maintenance oost Under Alternative 2 besides the cost one must consider the impact on the combined sewer ~y~tem. A~ of yet t-his is no~ quantifiable. If one considers only metropolitan costs as was done in the previous study areas and ~he possible adverse effect fro~ the increased overflows from the combined ~ewer system on the river; Alternative 1 is the most cost effective. However, it is felt that additional information regarding several alternatives like. serving northern Brooklyn Park at the new Anoka facility, or expanding the Anoka plant for only a limited service area and taking the remainder' of the Champlin flow'sou~ to the Metropolitan Plant should be considered and the results of the combined sewer overflow study should be analyzed before a .final decision regarding this area is made. This is expected to occur in mid 1979. Conclusions The knoka facility has adequate capacity to accommodate the expected growth in its service area to 1985 which includes the Anoka interceptor which is currently under design. The overall environmental assessment from these alternatives and any additional alternatives should be closely evaluated. That only seconda~! treatment at A~oka is needed to meet t_he proposed water quality standards.