Agenda - Council - 12/13/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

FerJphernl]y, it should be noted that: 1. Only TC¥ submitted reference that is currently operating on a fee-for-service basis, and, 2. HA submitted a reference that had only worked with HA for 6 months and a second reference that was very positive but admitted to very few personal contacts with These facts should not stand by themselves, but when reviewed with all other reference information, TCF has a qualitative edge on thc other agencies in this area of th--'~-~-~evaluat~on. Recommendation The previous evaluations can be summarized as follows: Account Executive's Oualifications Based upon the information given, TCF has a decisive advantage over the other agencies. Support Services Available All three agencies are closely bunched, with HA having a slight advantage over the others quantitatively. Oualitatively it is not clear, although supportin~--~ ~ocumentation sugge~%s that TCF prevail here. Office Location Administratively, no agency has an advantage here. Other factors, however, tend to favor HA, who will be located in Ramsay, and whose agent o1' record ~s a Ramsay resident. Willingness to Enter - Formal Service Agreement No difference. Services to be Provided - No quantitative difference. Relationship with Principal Market All three agencies desire to approach the League. Based on the current volume of business, F~_B_BS is~the predominant agency, followed by 'TcFo ~A currently han__~dles ~vety s~a!l amount o~' business through the League. Services Provided by Markets All three agencies responded that their markets could provide the services Ramsay requires. There isino quantitative or qualitative difference between the agencies.