Laserfiche WebLink
Motion tan'Jori. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Elvig and Pearson. Voting <br />No: (:otmcilmcml>ers Kural(, Stronm~en and Zimmennan. <br /> <br />Cotmcilmcmbcr Stm,'nmet-~ stated il pains her to vote against the planning, but she cannot vote in <br /> of'it witlloul public hlput. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilrncrnber f::;lvig, '~econded by Councilmernber Pearson, to hold a public input <br />session al'tel I-loisington m,d Keel, let Group, Inc. ratifies the concept of the greenway, parks, <br />trail:;, and in t'nt.structure itl thc area of the comprehensive plan amendment study. The fro'mat of <br />tho public input session should be discussed at a worksession. <br /> <br />Further discus:;io~. £.'ouncilmomb,':r Strommen stated she will support public input, but hopes <br />there will be n~ol-<; conversation about what it will entail. Councilmember Zimmerman stated a <br />timeline has n¢)l been laid out for thc public input process, and the public will end up being <br />presented wilh a plan thc City }las.put together. Councilmember Elvig stated the public input <br />should bc obtained after the two layers of greenway and infrastructure information have been <br />gathered. Cotmcilmcmber Kurak ;tsl,a~.d if the motion is clear to staff. Assistant Community <br />Devclopmcm 13irector Trudgeon responded the direction is to Proceed with the public input <br />process when some o£ the basic b. tycrs of information are completed. Councilmember Elvig <br />stated tho only lay~n's that should b,_: completed are the feasibility study for sewer and water, and <br />grec~nsl)aCc i~11bt'lnalion. <br /> <br />Motion ctu'ried. Voting Yes: Mayc, r Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Pearson, Cook, Kurak and <br />S from men. V()ling No: Co u~cilmember Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Motion by Counci}mcmbcr Pearso~t, seconded by Councilmember Elvig, to authorize staff and <br />Boltol] & Mc~Jl< to begin thc design of the infrastructure extension project. <br /> <br />la'urthcr discussion: C. ounci hncmbcr K urak requested the Council' receive information regarding <br />how those costs will be recouped b,-.' thc City in the future. Councilmember Zimmerman asked if <br />competitive biddi~Lg was used with this. Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied bidding <br />is not rcquh'ed fbr professional ser¥icc. These costs are extremely competitive for this type of <br />project. (:ouncihncmber Zimmerr,~an stated the only thing the public knows is if there were <br />bidders amt who Ii:.td thc lowest bi{I. /\ssistant Public Works Director Olson stated he does not <br />km)w that they would want tile low bid for professional smwices. Mayor Gamec noted Bolten & <br />Monk is a firm the City has been worldng with and the City is comfortable with their work. <br />Councilmcmbcv Z(mmerman state{{ engineering costs were not part of the strategic plarming <br />session; it was onb./(bt' planning. (:oun¢ilmember Elvig stated planning cannot be done without <br />designing. <br /> <br />Motion rzm'ricd. Voting ","cs: lViayor Gamec, Councihnembers Pearson, Elvig, and Cook. <br />¥oting No: C'otmcilmcmbers Kura!-., Strommen and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />City Council/May 11, 2004 <br />Page 34 of 36 <br /> <br /> <br />