My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:29:10 AM
Creation date
12/28/2017 8:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 11/02/2017 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />6. 2. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Recommendations related to proposed Villas at North Fork subdivision; Case of Paxmar, LLC (Project <br />No. 17-145) <br />1. Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Rural Developing to Medium Density Residential <br />2. Zoning Amendment from Planned Unit Development to R-2 Residential <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a recommendation for a proposed Sketch Plan Review (100 lot subdivision), <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Rural Developing to Medium Density Residential + Urban Service Area <br />Extension), Zoning Amendment (Northfork Planned Unit Development to R-2 Residential). Conditional Zoning <br />Amendments are allowed by City Code Section 117-50 that allow a Zoning Amendment, but require that it follows <br />a specific site plan to avoid the potential for a completely different project to be proposed after said Zoning <br />Amendment. <br />This is the first time the Planning Commission has reviewed this project. Please note that Paxmar, LLC has <br />previously proposed a separate project in close proximity to this proposal, known as North Fork Meadows. The <br />current proposal, Villas at North Fork, is a new proposal on a different site proposed by the same developer. <br />The City has significant discretion in review of this project. Since the project requires a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment and Zoning Amendment, the City is not obligated to approve said project. It has been the City's policy <br />that the Developer must demonstrate a compelling reason to approve the change. This results in a higher standard of <br />review compared to projects that meet all minimum standards of their respective zoning district. <br />Notification: <br />Staff attempted to notify all Property Owners within 700 feet of the Subject Property of the Sketch Plan Review. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Sketch Plan Review <br />Sketch Plan review affords the Planning Commission the opportunity to weigh in on the general layout of the <br />project before the Developer incurs expenses related to the preparation of the Preliminary Plat (next step). The <br />Preliminary Plat is the most important approval granted to a project, as it gives entitlement to the project. The Final <br />Plat is the legal instrument recorded to subdivide the property into multiple parcels and includes construction -ready <br />plans. <br />Similar to North Fork Meadows, the Developer is requesting that the Zoning Amendment be approved prior to <br />preparation of Preliminary Plat. The attached Staff Review Letter outlines the process for this request. It is noted to <br />be acceptable with a Conditional Rezoning Agreement, but it outside the City's normal sequence. Unlike North <br />Fork Meadows, this project does also include a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment as well. <br />Future steps in review include the following. <br />1. Preliminary Plat <br />2. Final Plat <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.