My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/02/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:29:10 AM
Creation date
12/28/2017 8:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/02/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conditional Zoning Amendment <br />City Code Section 117-50 permits the City to make a Zoning Amendment conditional upon a specific proposal. A <br />concern was raised by the public at a previous public meeting that there was the potential to approve the Zoning <br />Amendment, then have a different project come in based on the new zoning district. These two tools allow the City <br />to protect itself from that scenario. The City Attorney has expressed some hesitation with this approach, but feels <br />the concern can be adequately mitigated with the correct language in an agreement. The City Attorney wants to <br />avoid perceptions of Contract Zoning (approval of a Zoning Amendment in exchange for some material <br />consideration, namely cash), which is not permissible. The Developer (Paxmar) desires to have the Zoning <br />Amendment approved, conditioned on substantial compliance with the current concept, before preparing <br />preliminary plat materials (due to cost to prepare a Preliminary Plat). Ordinarily, the Zoning Amendment would run <br />parallel with the Preliminary Plat, not before. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Developer. The Developer will be <br />responsible for the costs of construction of all infrastructure internal to the site. <br />The Developer has requested that a cost share agreement be approved for the final segment of Puma Street. The <br />Developer proposes to share the cost between itself, the City, and Capstone Homes (Owner/Developer of parcel to <br />the west). This will be discussed in detail with the Preliminary Plat. Action at this stage does not obligate or commit <br />the City to any investment in the project. <br />Recommendation: <br />The proposed subdivision is a significant departure from what was originally planned. Staff needs some broad <br />policy direction from the Planning Commission and City Council. The City has the ability to approve said project, <br />but is not obligated to do so. Staff could point out a number of positives of this project, but also acknowledges those <br />benefits come at a cost. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve/deny the request for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and <br />Conditional Zoning Amendment. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Sketch Plan <br />Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Plan <br />City Code Section 117-112 <br />Staff Review Letter <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill (Originator) Tim Gladhill 10/31/2017 09:19 AM <br />Form Started By: Tim Gladhill Started On: 10/31/2017 08:11 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 10/31/2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.