Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gerald Zimmerman <br />Page 2 <br />September 30, 1988 <br /> <br />B-1 Business District Zoning specifies a setback of 35 feet for <br />the rear yard. In this case with Highway 10 frontage, the <br />applicant contends that the area behind the building should be <br />viewed as a sideyard (setback would be 20'). The site plan <br />shows a setback of 12 feet from the east side of the lot. The <br />setback would need to be corrected or a variance would have to <br />be granted. <br /> <br />city Code 170.D15F requires the finished lot grade elevation of <br />all buildings to be a minimum of 18 inches above the centerline <br />grade of the adjacent public roadway. The grading plan <br />indicates a slab elevation of 865. <br /> <br />The applicant's estimated water usage appears to be excessive <br />and should be re-evaluated for design of the septic system (sea <br />attached letter). <br /> <br />Particular attention needs to be given to stormwater runoff and <br />holding for this property. A drainage easement may be required <br />dependent on submittal of final grading plans. <br /> <br />The buila~ng information and preliminary plans appear to be <br />consistent v;ith the intent of City Ordinances. The applicant <br />will require a CUP for the proposed advertising sign. <br /> <br />!0. No soil borings or pe~c tests have been conducted as yet. The <br /> applicant has indicated that final plans would be submitted <br /> contingent upon City approvals. All final plans must be <br /> certified by an architect or engineer. The applicant has <br /> indicated that, if approved, he intends to start construction <br /> next sprln~. <br /> <br />~_~ __~ concerns aha site crs~nage have been suf_ic~en%±y <br /> <br /> <br />