Agenda - Council - 10/25/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

26. That the proposed landfill will be disturbing to neighboring uses. 27. That the proposed landfill will be adequately served by essential public facilities and services. 28. That the proposed landfill may create excessive requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. 29. That the proposed use will involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will not be detrimental to any property, persons or the general welfare by production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 30. That the proposed landfill will not be consistent with the intent and purposes of the city's zoning code. 31. Due to the applicants' most recent su~'~vey, he has revised the estimated quantity of material remaining from the previous owner/operator, Prestressed Concrete to $000 cubic yards* and that !ess than 3% of the output from %he current concrete pipe manu- facturing operations is waste with current annual volume of con- crete pipe ~aste of about 400 to 500 cubic ~'ards and that if the operations were expanded, waste by product also would increase. (*Case discussion 10/12/88.) 32. That %he city engineer has reviewed the application material and has raised several concerns in = letter to th_ Zoning Co~,ission ..... e_n by reference. dated 9/8/88. Said letter is incorporated h=- ~ 33. That the applicant states that it is not economically feasible to ~ akuD and transport large concrete beams for disposal (= w e/s/ss). ~4 ='~ X 23 ~ a~~~an~ proposed 23 ce_=s apprcxl~= ¢~y 500' 5' d¢~D (2130 CY) . 35. Than ~_._ aoD!icant_~ has stated -~at_.. th=_ ma~=-~=', '~_~¢ be stoc):ui!ed and~u__~_'~'~=~ _,,~ t~=.. ==~. ,~P.H. 9/~/'~5), 3~. ~"~- -'~ auu!ican~ has '.-nai_ate~ that -_he '*'asue ~o==a ~_ covere~ by 6" cf u_mpcrarv cover and 2' . 37. Cha% %he proposed ex5ensicn cf C:'~y services :- appears that all cccur '-n apprcxlmate±y the scuther!y !/3 of s:-=.