Agenda - Council - 10/25/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

10. That Section 170o015C enables the Council or the Planning Commission to determine whether the proposed use is or is not compatible for development within the zoning district. 11. That the surrounding properties are zoned I-l, Industrial except to the south which is zoned B-l, Business. 12. That the closest residential area is greater than 1/4 mile from the proposed landfill. 13. The potential danger to the public by this landfill is unknown. 14. That the City's comprehensive plans indicate extension of the City's water service through the proposed landfill. 15. That the City's comprehensive plans indicate extension of sanitary sewer near the southern boundary of the parcel. 16. That the Highway 10 study proposes the extension cf McKinley Street as a frontage road through the proposed parcel. 17. That the Airport Master Plan approved by the City indicates that approximately 50% of the existing parcel is recor~ended to be ~ ' lear zone for Runway 34, accu_.ea as c That approximately 25% of the parcel lies within the innermost !000' cf the existing clear zone for Runway 34. .... na~ the applicant has stated that materials may be stockoiled and then buried once a year, perhaps in the fall (P.E. 9/8/85). 20. That the app~-.cant has stated that waste concrete would se ~ar~-',a~!x ...... ~ by runnin~ over the ~at~qa~ wi~h aco' z~ dur'.'~~ landfi!" 5n~ (?.H. 2; ~-~ no chh=~ der, c!~'icn !and.-'~s are ~urrent!v perm!thee wztn~ ~he City. 22. TkaL a sanitary, land=:~_,~_, is located aD_~rc>:i~.=%e!y one r. ile ncrth app_'~ca--Lcn for a ~~ %o permit vertical expansion. ~rcduced cn si%e (P.H. ~/8/S$). Du= nc ~"socs~ cf c~v on-s".t= produced waste, no ara=fig ir. pa~-ns a~= err. et-ed on adi'.cinin~ roads ~ the area Than nba orcmcsed iandf:~ ~s . . nc ..... ~ .... c~j actives c= ..... -~o Ciuv's