Laserfiche WebLink
Case #7: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review of T.J. & Associates Printing; Case of Sharp <br />and Associates, L.L.C. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained the City of Ramsey has received a request <br />for site plan review from Sharp and Associates, L.L.C. for the development of T.J. & Associates <br />Printing. The parcel is generally located in the northwest corner of McKinley Street and Sunfish <br />Lake Boulevard, in the proposed plat of Sunfish Gateway. She stated the Planning Commission <br />reviewed the site plan on June 6, 2002. The Planning Commission recommended that Staff and <br />the Developer work together regarding staff's recommendation to provide additional plantings <br />along the north and western boundary line of the subject property. The Applicant is proposing to <br />plant Boston Ivy along the fence that exists along the western boundary line. The topography <br />along the northern boundary line will not provide the best location for additional tree plantings. <br />The Applicaut will be providing additional trees along the eastern boundary line of the plat as an <br />alternative. The revised landscaping plan is acceptable to Staff. She stated the Planning <br />Commission recommended that the City Council approve the site plan contingent upon <br />compliance with City Staff review letter dated May 31, 2002, revised June 21, 2002 and the <br />proposed Sunfish Gateway plat receiving final plat approval and Sunfish Gateway being <br />recorded at Anoka County. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Hendriksen, to approve the site <br />plan for T.J. & Associates Printing contingent upon compliance with City Staff review letter <br />dated May 31, 2002, revised June 21, 2002, and Sunfish Gateway receiving final plat approval <br />and the Developer recording the plat at Anoka County. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Hendriksen asked if they were still approving the rock face <br />block that they paint or did they close the loophole. Community Development Director Frolik <br />stated they were rewriting the commercial/industrial sections of the Chapter Nine Review Sub- <br />committee. Mr. Dennis Sharp, Sharp and Associates, stated the owner picked out a colored, <br />striped rock face, so the rock would not be painted. Councilmember Zimmerman asked if it <br />would be the same as his previous buildings. Mr. Sharp stated that it would not be because it <br />was rock and would not be painted. City Administrator Norman stated there was more glass on <br />this building. Councilmember Hendriksen stated Mr. Sharp had built nice buildings and it was <br />nice they were not painting them anymore. Mr. Sharp stated that he preferred to paint the <br />buildings. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Hendriksen, Anderson, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated he (Sharp) should compliment his daughters because they have done a good <br />job. <br /> <br />City Council/June 25, 2002 <br />Page 22 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />