Laserfiche WebLink
suggested if the resident wants it vacated, then maybe the City should ask what they would be <br />willing to pay for it. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer noted the location of a potential future utility connection. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated he does not know that the <br />City gave park dedication for this easement but typically when getting this kind of easement, the <br />City knew it would have value for the sanitary sewer so it may be the City called attention to the <br />need for the trail easement. He noted there would be a cost to remove the trail, if that was <br />desired. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johns asked if the resident wants to keep the bituminous. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated the resident is not asking to remove the bituminous but the reason <br />to remove it is to keep pedestrians from accessing the private property behind them. He stated <br />since there were issues and the Police Department was called, it has not again been a problem. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johns asked if the Park and Recreation Commission prefers the other <br />alternative. She noted it would result in getting low ground for high ground, which is not a good <br />exchange. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated the Park and Recreation <br />Commission did not have the background and did not get into that level of detail but did <br />understand it was half an easement so they supported vacating it. He asked if removal of the <br />blacktop back to the sidewalk would be just as good to them. Or, the easement could be vacated <br />and when a new person buys the home, they may want the blacktop removed so one alternative <br />may be whether removing the blacktop but not vacating would be acceptable. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Riley, seconded by Councilmember Johns, to recommend that the City <br />Council not vacate the pedestrian trail easement on Lot 6, Block 3, Wildlife Sanctuary Third <br />Addition, but talk with the resident about removing the blacktop with the resident responsible for <br />restoration. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley and Councilmember Johns. Voting No: None. <br />Absent: Councilmember Shryock. <br /> <br />Councilmember Shryock arrived at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />rd <br />5.02: Consider Request for Additional Stop Signs at the Intersection of 163 Avenue / <br />Marble Street <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer reviewed the staff report and explained staff has received a <br />rd <br />petition signed by 17 residents requesting additional stop signs at the intersection of 163 <br />Avenue and Marble Street. Currently, there are stop signs on the Marble Street portions of the <br />intersection. The requested action would change this intersection to an all stop condition. He <br />Public Works Committee / November 21, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 16 <br /> <br />