Laserfiche WebLink
Further discussion: It was noted that staff should reach out to the two specific property owners if <br />those property owners do not reply to the mailer. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Kuzma and Johns. Voting <br />No: None. <br />5.02: Recommend Authorization for Civil Engineering Planning Services for Highway 10 <br />Planning Effort <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and stated that the purpose <br />of this case is to consider recommending that the City Council authorize a work order with <br />Bolton and Menk to perform planning and engineering services related to future Highway 10 <br />design. He stated staff is only seeking approval for Phase 1 (project justification, concepts, <br />evaluation) not Phase II (vision refinement, preliminary design, funding). He explained that staff <br />has already completed three rounds of refining the scope and scaled back on <br />renderings/visualizations, public meetings, and communication assistance. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill described the scale and magnitude of the project, <br />noting it is a significant investment with total capital costs of the improvements themselves being <br />over $70 million. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill presented alternatives for the Committee's <br />consideration and stated staff recommends proceeding forward with the work order. Bolton and <br />Menk was the engineer for the Highway 10 Access Planning Study so there are a number of <br />efficiencies to use this same firm for this work order as opposed to bringing in a new firm. <br />Eric Johnson, Bolton and Menk, stated that the previous Highway 10 study had a different <br />vision, focusing on a high-level idea that all parties could agree on. He highlighted some of the <br />differences, noting the desire to have grade separations at the railroad crossings, which will be <br />added as a new element rather than being an afterthought in the previous plan. He stated that this <br />element will also look to the future, rather than just focusing on how the road operates today. He <br />stated that they are pretty confident that the Anoka improvements will be fully funded in 2018 <br />and therefore the improvements will be completed between 2020-2022. He noted that once those <br />improvements are completed, the first stoplight will be at Sunfish Lake and that will become the <br />next priority to fix on the system. He stated that the attempt would be to develop a plan that <br />could gain support from the other communities as well, to ensure that funding could be obtained <br />in the future. <br />Angie Bersaw, Bolton and Menk, stated that although the problem has been identified, this study <br />will not only focus on the current problems but also on future problems. She stated that a key <br />step in the planning stage would be to ensure that all road owners (Ramsey, Anoka County and <br />MnDOT) can be on the same page. She explained that the first phase of the study will be to <br />develop one vision and noted that the second phase would then dig deeper to determine the <br />elements that would be necessary, which is why it would make sense to split the work into two <br />phases as staff has suggested. <br />Public Works Committee / January 16, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 14 <br />