My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 12/14/2017
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2017
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 12/14/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:15:18 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 3:35:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
12/14/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
claw -backs should exist? Staff wants to avoid this item being an afterthought by a developer, and come up at <br />the end of the negotiation process --then the developer feeling upset the city is not being reasonable. Staff <br />thinks the City's expectations should be set upfront. Staff would also ask for direction to develop a <br />recommendation on this item. <br />(7) Get the Deal on Paper <br />Staff would suggest the Council provide general direction to negotiate a 'draft version' of a formal purchase <br />agreement. Depending on where we settle, this too will effect staffs recommendation on this project. At this <br />point, Rum River Hills is informally offering about 30K per usable acre, and about $7,500 per acre for <br />non -buildable land. From a very preliminary perspective, this seems like a reasonable deal for the city, based <br />on the land transaction only. However, until we review an actual agreement, we are only speculating. The PA <br />would also cover other important items (proposed cost -share agreements, performance requirements, <br />infrastructure improvements, etc.). A draft PA will help everyone involved with this project better track, <br />within one document, what the deal looks like. <br />Action: <br />Provide recommendations for the City Council: <br />1. What do you think of the project? What are your thoughts? <br />2. Should the Council/ staff continue to pursue? <br />3. Do you support staffs recommendations/ do you have changes? <br />Attachments <br />Background Info and Maps <br />Proposal <br />Process <br />FAQs <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 12/07/2017 11:16 AM <br />Form Started By: Patrick Brama Started On: 11/16/2017 04:44 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 12/07/2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.