My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #02-02-040 - 02/26/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
2002
>
Resolution - #02-02-040 - 02/26/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:32:04 AM
Creation date
3/14/2018 2:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#02-02-040
Document Date
02/26/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 26, Township 32, Range <br />25, Anoka County, Minnesota. <br /> <br />(the "Subject Property") <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on May 15, 2001 the City received an application for a preliminary plat <br />known as The Ponds (the "Development"); and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 5, 2001, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding <br />the preliminary plat pursuant to City Ordinances and Minnesota State Statutes and recommended <br />approval of the preliminary plat subject to conditions; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 26, 2001, the City Council considered the preliminary plat for the <br />Development; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on June 26, 2001, the City Council tabled the preliminary plat request after <br />the Developer withdrew a rezoning application that was needed in order to properly plat the <br />Development; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on July 2, 2001 the City recei,ded correspondence from the State of <br />Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (the "EQB") stating that it had received a citizen petition <br />requesting that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (the "EAW") be completed for the <br />Development; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on July 30, 2001, City Staff sent the EQB a letter stating that the Developer <br />had withdrawn its rezoning application that was needed in order to properly plat the Development <br />and that the City Council was unable to proceed in the review process with the Development; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the luly 30, 2001 letter to the EQB stated that if the applicant reapplies to <br />subdivide the Subject Property within one year of receiving the citizen petition, the City would <br />make a decision on the citizen petition; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on December 14, 2001, the City received an application for a preliminary <br />plat approval from the Developer; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, on January 3, 2002, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and <br />reviewed the preliminary plat and recommended approval of the preliminary plat subject to certain <br />conditions; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City hired Pro Source Technologies, Inc. to review the citizen petition <br />and make a determination on the issues presented in the petition; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, in correspondence dated August 3, 2001, Pro Source Technologies, Inc. <br />determined that the Development will not have a significant environmental effect and that the <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #02-02-040 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.