Laserfiche WebLink
10. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicant of <br /> rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have <br /> additional garage space on the premises. <br /> <br />11. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />12. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public <br /> street. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />17. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that is denied <br /> to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Chairperson Nixt, <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt <br /> Board Member Johnson <br /> Board Member Brauer <br /> Board Member Kociscak <br /> Board Member Reeve <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br /> None <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br /> Board Member Watson <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #02-09-201 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />