Laserfiche WebLink
That City Code allows for a total of 3,664 square feet of garage and accessory buildings on <br />the Subject Property; there is one existing garage that is 891 square feet in size; the proposed <br />garage is 1,200 square feet in size; the existing and proposed garage total 2,091 square feet, <br />which is in compliance with the 3,664 square foot limit. <br /> <br />That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally apply <br />to other properties in the district; namely the rear yard contains the primary drainfield, area <br />for an alternate drainfield, and mature Oak trees; the majority of the western portion of the <br />Subject Property consists of wetlands and tree cover; and the east side yard is only 25 feet <br />wide. <br /> <br />That the location of the dwelling on the Subject Property establishes the minimum front yard <br />setback for accessory structures and a previous owner of the Subject Property sited the <br />dwelling location. <br /> <br />10. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br /> <br />11. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-1 Residential <br /> District. <br /> <br />12. That the variance requested is the minimum variance that would alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />13. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent <br /> property. <br /> <br />14. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably increase the congestion in the public <br /> street. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. <br /> <br />16. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> <br />17. That if granted, the variance will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />18. That, if granted, the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that is denied <br /> to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Chairperson Nixt, <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt <br />Board Member Johnson <br />Board Member Brauer <br />Board Member Kociscak <br />Board Member Reeve <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #02-09-203 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />