Laserfiche WebLink
of something around $100,000 per impervious acre — and using the northwest quadrant of the COR to demonstrate how this <br />might work, take the approximately 30 acres (north of the parkway and west of the Lake Ramsey), multiplied by 80% impervious <br />land cover (buildings, parking lots, streets, etc.) equals 24 acres, multiplied by $75,000 per acre (mid -range cost for shared <br />approach) and the City would receive $1,800,000 from property owners/developers to design and build the system (see Estimate <br />of Probable Construction Costs — Greenway Trail + Stormwater Management Corridor). <br />2. Define permanent stormwater/utility/recreation/access easements (that run with the land) that will reserve adequate acreage to <br />accommodate district system design and construction. <br />3. Draft agreements (we have a successful template/model for this) between property owners/developers and the City to clearly <br />define relationships, roles/responsibilities, timelines and other considerations. <br />Scenario 3 - Metropolitan Council - Livable Communities Demonstration <br />Account (LCDA) <br />This Scenario is based on recent success securing grant monies from the Metropolitan Council to support design and construction of <br />public realm improvements. Over the past several years, their project selection/award criteria has changed somewhat to reflect more <br />contemporary and innovative development approaches. Toward that end, they are no longer funding purely infrastructure projects, <br />but are more interested in proposals that link specific development sites with <br />public transit, district systems (stormwater, parking, etc.) and creative design <br />of `signature public places'. <br />For example, in a recent successful application for the Prospect North <br />Redevelopment District, the Metropolitan Council LCDA awarded one <br />million dollars for improvements to Fourth Street (named "Green Fourth"), <br />but also to be shared with the adjacent Cornerstone Development (mixed - <br />use, housing over retail). Basically this one-third, two-thirds split is a <br />mandate intended to thoughtfully integrate design solutions for both <br />projects, including streetscape, stormwater management and other district <br />system elements. <br />Strategies: <br />1. Seek willing development partners who will participate in shared -project <br />scenarios similar to the example described above; with a specific focus <br />on joint funding applications to help pay for various elements of your <br />proposed signature parks and public spaces. <br />2. Carefully blend the interface between public and private property, <br />particularly along the edges of proposed signature parks and public <br />spaces, promoting flexible use, vibrant/inviting destinations and universal access. This will build a strong case for shared funding <br />while illustrating the many shared benefits of an integrated design and project implementation approach. <br />Public Realm Framework + Cost Evaluation <br />