Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission 6. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 05/03/2018 <br />By: Chloe McGuire Brigl, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Resubmitted Concept of Shade Tree Cottages; Case of Shade Tree Communities <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Shade Tree Communities has contacted the City and expressed a desire to resubmit a proposed plat known as Shade <br />Tree Cottages. This is a project that went through City review approximately ten (10) years ago and received final <br />plat and site plan approval as well as a zoning amendment to rezone the parcel to Planned Unit Development <br />(PUD). The project is a mix of small -lot single-family and detached townhomes (villas/detached single-family with <br />HOA maintenance). While the final plat and site plan have expired, the zoning of PUD has not. The applicant has <br />submitted a revised concept plan taking into account current zoning regulations. <br />Notification: <br />No notification is required since a formal application has not been received. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />While the final plat and site plan have long since expired, the approval of the Zoning Amendment to Planned Unit <br />Development is still valid as the City never considered a subsequent Zoning Amendment to revert back to the <br />underlying Zoning District of R-1 Residential (MUSA). Staff has verified with the City Attorney that the project <br />must go through the subdivision process again, due to expiration of the original plan and changes to regulations. <br />Specifically, current standards related to lot depth and wetland setbacks are considerably different than when the <br />proposed development was originally designed. <br />The applicant has submitted a revised concept plan that better complies with current regulations. For example, the <br />applicant is attempting to account for the current 16.5 foot wetland setback and has adjusted roadway alignments to <br />reflect adjacent property owner's lot boundaries. In reviewing the concept plan, Staff found several deviations from <br />the current R-1 (MUSA) regulations. Specifically, lots 32 and 33 do not appear to meet lot depth requirements. The <br />proposed net density appears to meet code requirements at approximately 2.7 units per acre. The code also requires <br />16.5 foot wetland setbacks, which appear to be met with the revised plan. <br />The applicant is working on articulating the public purpose for the PUD, but in discussions with the applicant, the <br />public purpose has centered around permanent dedication of trails and wetlands. The applicant is also open to <br />architectural standards for the new homes, such as requiring front porches, a mix of materials, and specific designs. <br />Staff hosted a public workshop regarding the project on February 1, 2018. Neighboring landowners attended the <br />meeting and raised questions regarding dewatering of the wetland, utilities, infrastructure upgrades, and mitigating <br />the impacts to surrounding property owners. The Planning Commission was introduced to this topic on March 1, <br />2018. <br />The applicant has requested that the City share the cost of paving Potassium Street. Staff is working with the <br />applicant to get more precise estimates regarding the paving project, and will have a discussion regarding the <br />cost -share with City Council when the estimates are available. <br />Rough estimates from the Engineering Department estimate $300 per linear foot for the paving which includes <br />sidewalks, sewer, water, and a contingency of 25%. There will likely also be issues that arise during the planning <br />