My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/25/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 01/25/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:39:08 PM
Creation date
1/21/2005 2:36:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/25/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The subdivision is showing a public street servicing the units. City Code restricts cul-de-sac (or <br />dead end streets) to 600 feet; the proposed~ public street exceeds this requirement. The project is <br />being proposed as a PUD and deviations arc'permitted and therefore the cul-de-sac length will <br />need to be addressed as part of the P.UD agreement. The. sketch plan is providing for a connection <br />to the adjacent property to the south as required by City Code. <br /> <br />There is a substantial wetland on the proposed plat that will need to be' delineated and <br />encumbered with drainage and utility easements on the preliminary and final, plats. <br /> <br />A detailed grading and drainage plan will be reViewed as part of the preliminary plat submittal. <br />The subdivision will be subject to permitting by the Lower Rum River Watershed Management <br />Organization. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan at their January 6, 2004 meeting. Although <br />sketch plan's are not subject to an official PUblic hearing, Chairperson Nixt allowed comments <br />from residents in attendance. Several residents stated their opposition regarding the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission unanimously denied the sketch plan based on concerns with the <br />proposed density, wetland/topography challenges, and lack of compliance with the PUD <br />guidelines. <br /> <br />It should be mentioned that subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, staff received a <br />revised sketch plan showing 24 units Compared to the previously proposed 28 units. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />As mentioned above, the Planning Commissionrdenied the sketch plan. However, City COde <br />states that an applicant has the right to request that the City Council review a sketch plan. The <br />applicant is exercising this option and is requesting input from the City Council. <br /> <br />The intent of sketch plans are to merely get a conceptual look at a proposed subdivision. The <br />details related to compliance with PUD guidelines (i.e. open space), setbacks, and architectural <br />standards are reviewed in great detail during preliminary plat review. Often times the <br />comprehensive preliminary plat and site plan reView process results in adjustments to the number <br />and location of the units and streets. : <br /> <br />Staff recognizes that the Planning Commission and area residents have concerns related to this <br />development and that there are details to work through. However, with that said, it is staff's <br />opinion that the proposed single unit townhomes and the proposed 3.4 units per acre density is an <br />appropriate use of the subject property] FUrthermore, City Code establishes that low density <br />twonhome developments not exceed 4 units/acre is an .acceptable land use in the R-1 District. ' <br />Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council direct the applicant to proceed to preliminary <br />plat and begin working through City Code requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.