Laserfiche WebLink
and this is the type of thing theY absolutely did not want in Town Center. He is still opposed to <br />giving D.R. Horton a break and does not::want them to take advantage of the City by not doing <br />anything for a year. City Administrator Norman indicated with this agreement D.R. Horton will <br />be building 179 units as opposed to 900 UnitS. 103 of the units would be built at the 2004 fees. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated only the 103 units have received final plat <br />approval. City Attorney Goodrich advised a motion on this ordinance should include a statement <br />that the expiration is December 31, 2005'. Councilmember Elvig noted there are other phases <br />D.R. Horton may still be looking at in TOwn Center for final plat approval. Final plat approval is <br />generally the time of payment, but D.R. Horton has an allocation agreement that states they will <br />pay the sewer and water charges at the .time of building permit. That leaves 76 units that would <br />have the allocation agreement with the City that D.R. Horton pays at time of the building permit <br />that have not gone through the final Plat Stage. At the time of final plat the City could request <br />that the fees be paid at that time, bUt he does not know how successful the City would be at <br />forcing the hand. He questioned if the citY is .this lenient with other folks as far as when they <br />will pay and stated he woutd hate to have this leach into something else. Assistant Public Works <br />Director Olson replied the reason this ordinance works specifically for this developer is because <br />thc City has never swayed from the policy of requiring payment at the time of final plat until <br />now. Councihnember Strommen stated it is at the developer's risk that the fees go up. This was <br />bad policy in the beginning, and now a precedent is being set. On the other hand, she would <br />question if they want D.R. Horton building in the. City. Councilmember Jeffrey questioned if it is <br />included in the contract with D.R. Horton that:they will not develop the rest of the 900 units. <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that agreement is between D.R. Horton and RTC. <br />Councilmember Strommen stated she would not go through with this ordinance until this is <br />spelled out in the agreement. City Administrator Norman indicated this is the introduction of the <br />ordinance and the agreement will be in place by the time the ordinance comes back for adoption <br />in two weeks. Councilmember Elvig asked if there is any activity on the property at this time. <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the most recent activity was by the master <br />developer to get the site pad ready. Councilmember Jeffrey clarified the contract between D.R. <br />Horton and RTC regarding the number °f Units that will be developed will be in place when this <br />ordinance comes back before the:Council for adoption. Mayor Gamec stated if the agreement is <br />not in place the Council can opt not to adopt the ordinance. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Jeffrey, Olson, and <br />Pearson. Voting No: Councilmembers Elvig and Strommen. <br /> <br />Further discussion: City Attorney Goodrich clarified the motion that was just acted on agrees <br />with the expiration date on the fees of December 31, 2005. Mayor Gamec indicated D.R. Horton <br />could be informed that even though this ha~ been approved tentatively with these dates there are <br />concerns and future approval is contingent On some other comments. <br /> <br />Case #8: <br /> <br />Adopt Resolution AuthOrizing Application for 2005 Community <br />Development BloCk Grant (CDBG) Funds <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director/Executive HRA Director Frolik explained that <br />Anoka County received CDBG funds fromlthe Department of Housing and Urban Development <br /> <br />City Council/January 11, 2005 <br /> page 15 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />