Laserfiche WebLink
compares extremely well with the projected residential population at the RTC site of <br />10,378 persons (Table 13.6). <br />Similarly, the total future projected water usage for 2020 is estimated to be 4.505 MGD <br />which equates to an equivalent population of about 30,000 persons. In comparison, the <br />information contained in Tables 13.1 and 13.2 estimates the 2020 population served by <br />the community water system to be approximately 28,000 persons. The difference <br />between the two of 2,000 equivalent persons is in line with the 2001 Comprehensive Plan <br />and can be attributed to two factors. <br />First, the number of new housing units to be built between 2000 and 2020 was estimated <br />in the Plan to be 4,800 (3,346 single family and 1,434 multi -family units). Of this <br />amount, we now know that the RTC site will contribute 2,400 housing units alone while <br />using only a small percentage of the land available for development within the Urban <br />Growth area. Secondly, the Plan did not consider the higher water usage per acre of <br />developed land using the higher density development model inherent in the RTC design. <br />The historic peaking factor for water usage is about 2.6. Based on the above, the peak <br />daily flows for 2020 will be about 11.7 MGD. Potential impacts on the FIG or other <br />resources during average and peak demand are discussed in Appendix F. In addition, <br />storage and distribution designs for the RTC and future development should take into <br />account the need to meet these demands. <br />In short, growth projections and the assumed resulting water usage estimated in the 2001 <br />Comprehensive Plan seem to be generally in line with the projections of this Item. The <br />difference discussed above, which is based on design and growth information not <br />available during the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan, results in an increase in <br />future water usage of about 7% above that anticipated. <br />Summ ry of Environmental Impact. To meet the projected future demands, the City will <br />most likely increase appropriations from the Franconia -Ironton -Galesville (FIG) aquifer. <br />At a minimum, two additional wells (#6 and #7) will be required to meet the RTC <br />demand with the need for additional wells as growth continues. Appendix F indicates <br />that at full 2020 build out, there will be a need for as many as 4 or 5 additional wells <br />pumping at rates similar to the existing ones. <br />Groundwater level data for the FIG that is collected continuously by the City shows that <br />trending has been in an upward direction in the last two years meaning a recharge <br />condition existed during this period (Appendix F). In addition, because the pumps <br />operate intermittently, they allow the aquifer to recover on a daily basis with a maximum <br />residual drawdown level averaging of 5- to 10-feet during peak summer demand. This <br />would mean that the radius of influence for the wells is very, very small. Taken together, <br />that water levels are rising in the FIG and that there is very little drawdown, water level <br />fluctuations in the surficial drift material are not anticipated. In addition, it does not <br />appear that the municipal wells would have any negative influence on private wells <br />developed in the same unit. However, long term monitoring of the surficial aquifer's <br />13-7 <br />