Laserfiche WebLink
the attached Feasibility Report. <br />The City evaluates and rates the condition of pavement sections on all City streets on an annual basis using the <br />Pavement Surface Evaluation and Rating (PASER) system. In the summer of 2018, the pavement section of the <br />above referenced street segments were rated with a PASER rating of 3 which indicates these streets require <br />complete reconstruction. <br />Pictures of the existing streets are located in Appendix A in the attached Feasibility Report. <br />Proposed Improvements <br />The existing bituminous pavement section will be reconstructed using the Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) process, <br />which involves reclaiming the existing bituminous pavement section, along with a portion of the underlying <br />aggregate base. The reclaim material generated by this process is then spread over the reshaped and compacted <br />existing aggregate base between the curb and gutter. Excess reclaim material is then removed and hauled off site to <br />allow 3'/2-inches of new bituminous pavement to be placed over the remaining compacted reclaim material. This <br />results in a 7-ton pavement design, which is the City standard for residential streets. <br />Existing ditches will likely require some re -grading. Driveway culverts are generally not anticipated to be affected <br />by this project. Additional storm sewer is anticipated to be added to improve storm runoff water quality prior to <br />flowing into Trott Brook. Drainage easements may also be needed in one or more locations. <br />Estimated Costs <br />The engineer's opinion of probable costs for completing the proposed improvements outlined in this report is <br />$502,555.46. Estimated costs include 5-percent contingency costs plus 23-percent indirect costs for administrative, <br />engineering, finance and legal costs. A summary of the engineer's opinion of probably costs is included in <br />Appendix Bin the attached Feasibility Report. <br />Funding Program <br />This project is proposed to be funded using a combination of street reconstruction bond proceeds in the amount of <br />$371,754.41, special assessments to benefiting properties in the amount of $92,784.30, and storm sewer funds in the <br />amount of $38,016.75. <br />A total of 21 benefiting parcels have been identified as eligible for special assessments. Staff recommends applying <br />25-percent of all eligible project costs equally across the 21 assessable properties using the "per lot" assessment <br />method as allowed by the City's adopted Special Assessments Policy. Eligible project costs include all costs except <br />those related to subgrade corrections. This results in a proposed preliminary assessment rate of $4,418.30 per <br />assessable parcel. <br />Staff recommends ordering a special benefit consultation report for this project to verify the proposed assessment <br />amount will not exceed benefit to the properties. If the report concludes the benefit to assessed properties is less <br />than the proposed preliminary assessment rate, Staff will then propose to lower the assessment rate accordingly <br />during the Assessment Hearing, which is scheduled for October 8, 2019. If the report verifies the assessment rate as <br />proposed is justified, Staff will propose to adopt the final assessment roll using the rate as preliminarily proposed. <br />This improvement project is listed in the City's current 10-year Capital Improvement Plan. <br />Public Comment <br />Staff conducted a public information meeting for this project at 5:00 PM on Thursday, November 8, 2018. The <br />purpose of the meeting was to present the proposed improvements, estimated costs, funding program, and <br />preliminary project schedule to benefiting property owners, and to receive public input on the project. Property <br />owners from 2 of the 21 identified benefiting properties attended. <br />In summary, the property owners agreed that the pavement was in poor condition and needed to be repaired but <br />they thought the estimated project cost was too high and questioned why the City couldn't maintain the roads in a <br />