My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/13/2003 - Not Signed
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2003
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 11/13/2003 - Not Signed
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:12:50 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 1:24:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Title
Not Signed
Document Date
11/13/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assistant Public Works Director Olson noted this was a good point. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Shryock to accept $1,800 per lot and $475 trail'fee and also the 60.73 <br />feet that runs along Armstrong as required trail easement. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson asked if it was past precedent that they require a traiI: <br />corridor along county roads or that trails must be constructed along major roadways. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns was not sure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock stated a lot of times this comes in conjunction with construction of the <br />roadway. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson recalled there was a subdivision that they did not require <br />a trail corridor on a one or two lot subdivision in Rogers Lake. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds recalled if there is any development or new platting, they install a trail <br />corridor if it abuts and existing roadway, that is set aside for trail development at some point in <br />the future. The trail does not need to be built, but the easement needs to be there. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns noted they are trying to get to Tiger Street. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson stated he was a little confused because he knew along the <br />trunk highway, it requires the corridor but there were other developments that required a trail but <br />not a corridor. <br /> <br />Comm/ssioner Shryock staied in certain areas they are concentrating on putting trails on certain <br />sides of the roads and since she has been on the Commission they have required this. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns explained that this isthe only reason why the corridor is happening along <br />Hwy 47. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson inquired if this was past precedent to have a corridor. <br />along county roads or rather along State higlxway roads. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman asked if theyshould table this item until next month to get additional <br />information regarding this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds noted they want to preserve that sixty-one feet so they do not need to go <br />back to the property owner for permission to get a trail built along Armstrong Bonlevard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock stated she did not think this was a question of if they wanted to preserve <br />this area, they needed to. The question is how much is required for the width of the corridor they <br />will be asking for. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/November 13, 2003 <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.