My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 02/22/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:41:25 PM
Creation date
2/18/2005 3:19:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
384
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Hampton replied he does not' have a prOblem with the road being public and paved if it is <br />moved. He does not want to lose his front yard. He explained he is not trying to stop <br />development, but he wants this to be a Mn/Win Situation. <br /> <br />Deb Sutherland, 6064 157th Lane; expressed iconcem that the road will be 25 feet from her back <br />fence. She stated there is no landscaping thht will deter the light and noise pollution from the site <br />on her back yard. That :has always been Icr~own aS a field of beauty and wildlife, and she would <br />rather see her furry little friends than a flock, of Children and families they cannot afford in their <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Chris Pickard, 15751 POtassium 'Street, thanked the Council for hearing their comments. He <br />stated he is a law enforcement officer ~and One of the main concerns is the amount of traffic that <br />will flow up to 157th Lane and out:onto CR 5. 157th Lane was never designed for the amount of <br />traffic that will come through there, and :this will be a safety hazard. He stated density is one of <br />the biggest problems and it looks :like the developer crammed something everywhere they could. <br />The plan does not include any open space land has encroached as much into the wetlands as it <br />can. He understands the applicant wants t° develop the land, but he would like to see a single- <br />family development. He explaiiled his house, is approximately 4,000 square feet and this <br />development and the development idisCusse/l on the next case would put nine houses facing onto <br />his yard that are only 1,500 square feet. :This plan would put high-density small units into an area <br />meant for larger houses. <br /> <br />Delores Fix, 6055 157t!~ Lane, questioned where they will school all of the kids from this <br />development. She stated she was a substitute teacher for 17 years for the Anoka/Hennepin <br />School District and she does not want the kids of Ramsey to go through what her kids had to go <br />though because the building was way ahead:of the development. Her son went to kindergarten in <br />a closet in Ramsey School and her daughter ;went to school outside of Ramsey School in a <br />portable. When her daughter got to high school she went to the high school and her locker, left <br />the school and got in a bus to travel to CorneliUs for three hours, returned from Cornelius and <br />went to high school in the afternoon. She stated if they keep building these condos like they have <br />been they will be in a worse problem than her kids were. She questioned if any developer can <br />come into the City and put up these condos in any neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec replied there are :zoning districts, but developers can request a PUD. The <br />landowners have the right to deVelop their land. :He explained the City works closely with the <br />school district, but the City cannot Solve the schOol district's problems. He has to look at the <br />development in the City and the school district wOrks closely with ~he City on where the kids will <br />go. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook indicated the school district is saying there is a decline in the elementary <br />school enrollment, which will be a future decline in the middle and high schools, and there is <br />room for growth. He explained these unitsl would be detached townhomes,, not condos. There <br />are less children in townhomes than in single,family homes. These detached townhomes attract <br />empty nesters and new homebuyers that mo-ce into different housing arrangements when they get <br />to the point of starting families. <br /> <br />city <br /> page 8 of 24 <br /> <br />25, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.