My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/06/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 01/06/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:54:34 PM
Creation date
2/23/2005 8:58:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
01/06/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Wald advised that the gate was removed at the City Council level for safety <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Petro stated that on this proposal, he i.s concerned with the way the road dead ends to the <br />west with a cul-de-sac. He indicated he believes there will be families with young kids, not just <br />empty nesters, and he wonders where the kids will play. He stated the natural path for kids to get <br />to Nowthen Boulevard from that call-de-sac is through his yard. <br /> <br />Milt Weichelt thanked Chairperson Nixt for his comments, stating those are the neighbors <br />concerns. He indicated he had a rePortthat ~ays Staff recommends approval, and asked what that <br />means. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated it means that Staff believes for a sketch plan this could be approved and <br />move forward to a more detailed Planning phase. <br /> <br />Mr. Weichelt stated that Was ridicUlous, and!Staff must not have looked at this plan at all. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer indicated there are ti~es when the Planning Commission does not agree <br />with Staff' s recommendation, but he stated~ he has been on other Commissions and he believes <br />Ramsey has one of the best staff with whicli he has ever worked. Commissioner Johnson agreed <br />wholeheartedly. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald stated tha,tbefore the Commission votes on the motion to table the case, <br />it would be appropriate to hear the ApPlican, t's preference on the options at this point: table the <br />case or request a recommendation from th6 Planning Commission to take forward to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Mark Strandlund stated he would like to moVe this on to the City Council. He indicated these are <br />not starter homes, they are $250~000 to $300,000 homes, and in past developments they were <br />sold 90% of the time to empty nesters. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudge9n indicated the purpose of the sketch plan is to <br />identify issues before the iapplican.t has significant investment in the project. He stated they heard <br />a lot of testimony tonight, and if the applicant wants to bring it forward and put his resources into <br />the project he should be allowed to do that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson withdrew his motion to table this request, and Commissioner Brauer <br />withdrew his second. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Brauer to deny the sketch plan. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 6, 2005 <br /> Page 1'4 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.