Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development DirectOr Trudge°n explained the City received an application from <br />Leroy Signs, Inc. requesting a conditional use permit to exceed sign size restrictions for the NAU <br />Country Insurance Co. single ocmipant building located at 7333 Sunwood Drive. State statute <br />requires notification of the public hearing to property owners within 350 feet of the subject <br />property. Staff notified property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the Town Center district sign <br />regulations, excluding the TC-2 subdistrict, are much more restrictive for the general Business <br />and Employment districts. These regulations were developed with the intention of applying them <br />to the core areas of the Town Center where therelwill be many multi-tenant buildings, with each <br />individual tenant having very limited frontage..The NAU County Insurance Co. building has <br />dimensions of 179 feet by 183 feet, hasi frOnta~ge along three public roads, and is a single- <br />occupant building. It is located in the TC-3 zoning district; which restricts wall-mounted signs to <br />a maximum of five percent of the ground floor building fagade area or 24 square feet, whichever <br />is less. Furthermore, lettering, numbers, or graphics are restricted to a maximum height of 12 <br />inches. However, businesses with frOntage~ on~ more than one public road are allowed the <br />perlnitted sign criteria for each street frontage, lie explained Leroy Signs Inc. is proposing to <br />install two wall-mounted signs, one on the front fggade of the building and one on the rear faCade <br />of the building. Leroy Signs Inc. is requeSting.an increase in square footage to 53.17 per sign, <br />with two-foot high letters, in order to have a Proportionately sized sign on the front and back of <br />the building. The applicant has stated that a Sigh meeting the current restrictions look severely <br />disproportionate on such a large building. ~either of the signs would project from the wall more <br />than six inches. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon advised that the City has, in the past, granted <br />conditional use permits for signs larger than allowed under City Ordinances. The Planning <br />Commission conducted a public hearing regarding Leroy Signs request on February 3, 2005 and <br />there was ilo public input. However, there was some discussion regarding the appropriateness of <br />the proposed sign size. Due to the fact that this is a large, single tenant building, staff believes <br />that the increased sign size is notonly proportionate to the building fagade but is also appropriate <br />itl terms of scale. He advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request by <br />a 3-2 vote. Staff is also recommending aPProval of the request to exceed the sign size <br />restrictions. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig noted the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting should be <br />corrected to show Commissioner Brauer as absent. He questioned if this ordinance is workable in <br />the way it has been drafted. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon replied in the zeal to regulate, the City may be too <br />strict in some cases. Overall in this district where there will be a number of multi-tenant <br />buildings staff wants to be careful. This:case was looked at very specifically, given this is a <br />single tenant building. This is the only sign they will have and is appropriate. He noted staff has <br />f~ound the ordinance difficult to implement in'praCtice. <br /> <br />City Council/February 22, 2005 <br /> Page 8 ,of 31 <br /> <br /> <br />