Laserfiche WebLink
21. That the Permittee is proposing to construct the both indoor riding arenas as hybrid Clear <br />Span buildings, with steel walls compatible with the indoor stalls, stables, and <br />hay/equipment barn, and a fabric roof material. <br />22. That the purpose of the proposed hybrid Clear Span construction is to eliminate any need <br />for supporting posts to ensure clear and safe riding areas for horses and riders, and the <br />fabric roofing will allow penetration of natural light and warmth, creating a healthier <br />environment for the horses and riders. <br />23. That due to the construction design of the roof and the width of the indoor riding arenas, it <br />forces the need for a higher ridge and greater roof slope to satisfy snow load requirements. <br />24. That sidewall height needs to be at least thirteen (13) feet to allow for proper head clearance <br />for indoor equestrian jumping. <br />25. That the mean gable height of both indoor riding arenas would be twenty-seven and a half <br />(27.5) feet and that both would be a total of forty-two (42) feet and that both would be taller <br />than the home on the Subject Property. <br />26. That one side of the proposed indoor stalls (for horses) will need to match the same height <br />as the indoor riding arenas, as these will connect directly to both indoor riding arenas. <br />27. That the City hosted a Public Workshop on January 3, 2019 to provide surrounding <br />property owners an opportunity to learn more about the proposed horse farm operation and <br />also brought forth the concept plan to the Planning Commission that same evening and to <br />City Council on January 22, 2019. <br />28. That the Permittee has made some adjustments to the proposed Site Plan in an attempt to <br />accommodate some concerns that were identified during the Public Workshop and by City <br />Staff relating to building height. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />1. That the reduced lot frontage and additional accessory building height will not <br />impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. <br />2. That the reduced lot frontage and additional accessory building height will not <br />unreasonably increase the congestion on the public street. <br />3. That the reduced lot frontage and additional accessory building height will not have <br />the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) <br />District. <br />4. That the reduced lot frontage and additional accessory building height will not <br />permit a lesser degree of public health, safety, and general welfare protection than <br />RESOLUTION #19-044 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />