My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Heinrich stated that perhaps the pet clinic be held at the dog park, to highlight <br />that amenity. <br />Police Chief Katers replied that Elm Crest was chosen because of the availability of bathrooms <br />and other facilities. <br />Mayor LeTourneau asked and received confirmation that the budget for this line item was $9,200 <br />and contains the containment services, licensing and pet clinic. He stated that the ordinance <br />serves one purpose, related to identification and reuniting. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that if the department is aware of the owner, or there is identification, <br />the animal would be returned to the owner rather than forwarded for containment. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that it seems that the largest cost savings would be reducing the <br />number of containments. He stated that perhaps this is more of a marketing issue and less of an <br />ordinance issue. He stated that if the ordinance could be marketed more and there was more <br />compliance, there would perhaps be less containment. <br />Police Chief Katers stated that some type of identification would be helpful; it would not <br />necessarily need to be licensing or registration. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that theoretically that would make sense. She explained that <br />people that would have licenses on their pets are more likely to be mindful of the location of <br />their pets. She noted that if there is a stray or nuisance animal, perhaps that resident is not as <br />concerned and would be less likely to license. She stated that if the ordinance is not going to be <br />enforced, there is no need for it and education would be a better option. She noted that articles in <br />the newsletter could encourage people to have a tag on their dog collar with a name and address. <br />She stated that people less likely to comply with a license might be willing to simply put a collar <br />and tag on them. <br />Mayor LeTourneau asked if the cost for containment can be charged back to residents. <br />Police Chief Katers confirmed that if a resident picks up their animal, that cost of containment is <br />charged back to the resident. He noted that there are cases where the animal has been abandoned <br />or is not picked up and the cost then is absorbed by the City. <br />It was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to review an option that would eliminate the <br />requirement for pet licensing/registration and instead focus on marketing other pet identification <br />methods. <br />2.02: Discuss Community Sign Options for Highway 10 and Highway 47 <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Kuzma asked the amount of money that was received from insurance from the <br />damage that was done from the accident at the location on Highway 47. <br />City Council Work Session / March 12, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.