My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 03/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:26:31 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Gladhill estimated that the City received about $7,500. He <br />stated that sign was pretty low quality and it would be a cost of about $25,000 for the planned <br />design which is much more durable and sturdier. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the Council has discussed this multiple times. He asked if the <br />question is on dollars, as the design has already been chosen. He stated that the Highway 47 sign <br />needs to be replaced and thought the Council already chose a good design. He stated that he is <br />comfortable with the direction they have been going and the cost estimate of $25,000 to $40,000. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked and received confirmation that the proposed location for the <br />Highway 47 sign would be the same. She asked if the landscaping would be included in the cost, <br />noting the ongoing maintenance that would be needed. She stated that perhaps less landscaping <br />would be an option to save funds. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer stated that landscaping would be labor intensive as hand <br />watering would be needed. He stated that in the past the sign was not metered and if lighting is <br />going to be added that would need to be metered and would have a cost of about $15 per month. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the landscaping would not have to be <br />added. He stated that it is a well -lit intersection and therefore the City would not have to light <br />the sign. He stated that the County is currently in the process of developing plans to improve <br />this intersection. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that she agrees with the prior Council that chose this design <br />option for the sign. She agreed that the ornamental flowers and plantings, or anything that would <br />need more maintenance should be eliminated. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would like to see some spot lighting for the sign, rather <br />than internal lighting. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that she would assume that this sign would not be within County <br />right-of-way and asked if the concern would be that the sign would need to be moved for <br />equipment. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that perhaps the City can work with Speedway <br />to have the sign located on private property to minimize the impact on the sign. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that he would hate to spend any money on a sign until staff is aware of <br />the plans of the County for the intersection. He stated that it appears there is consensus on the <br />design, with the addition of spot lighting and elimination of landscaping. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that perhaps solar lighting could be utilized. <br />City Council Work Session / March 12, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.