Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the <br />Planning Commission to adopt Ordinance #19-05 with the revisions included in the draft (limit <br />on hours of operation and outdoor speakers). The Planning Commission did take into account <br />feedback from the community and amended their original recommendation. <br />Councilmember Riley asked for a highlight of the restrictions and why those would be in place <br />for this district. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill explained that because this district would be located <br />within a residential neighborhood, there is a very short list of allowed uses to ensure that the <br />activity is not a nuisance for the adjacent residential properties. He stated that there are a few <br />extra layers of protection within this district, compared to others. He advised that there are also <br />specific uses that are prohibited, as they would not be a good fit for this type of district. <br />Councilmember Heinrich thanked staff for the diligence in listening to a multitude of residents <br />throughout this process. She noted that she spoke with a resident today that was concerned with <br />potential alcohol service and asked for additional input on the potential hours. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that the hours would be limited to 11:00 a.m. <br />to 9:00 p.m. for on -sale activity, which would be a location that also serves food; also, alcohol <br />cannot be taken off site. <br />Councilmember Shryock noted that a use that serves alcohol would be a conditional use, which <br />would mean that the request would come back before the Planning Commission and City <br />Council and would include a public comment process. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked and received confirmation that a business would still need to <br />obtain a liquor license. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that a public hearing would be required <br />for that type of land use within this district. He noted that a liquor license also requires a public <br />hearing and other elements, such as background check; therefore, this type of activity would be <br />subject to two public hearing processes. <br />Jaqueline Abendroth, 15810 Sodium Street NW, stated that she does not believe a use that serves <br />alcohol would be appropriate next to a daycare facility. She noted that she would also like <br />assurance that the property values in that area would remain intact and would not be negatively <br />impacted by this change in zoning. She did not believe alcohol should be served nearby a <br />residential area. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that she shares like concerns with on -sale liquor but wanted to <br />make sure that it is understood that this is a Citywide zoning tool. She explained that if there <br />were a proposed use of this type, that would require a public hearing and residents could then <br />express their concern. She stated that as they move into the next case, there are no changes <br />proposed that would open up that type of use. She stated that this rezoning will allow the <br />City Council / March 12, 2019 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />