My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:23:20 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 10:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment 6.1: The proposed Ramsey Town Center development proposes a mix of <br />housing and commercial development, on a massive scale, with 2,400 "attached" <br />residential units, and 1,651,000 square feet of commercial, industrial and institutional <br />area. The Town Center development appears highly likely to significantly increase <br />demand on already -congested roadways at TH 10-Ramsey Blvd. intersection, and the TH <br />10- Sunfish Lake Blvd. intersection - both of which will provide access to the <br />development. TH 10 is an Interregional Corridor (IRC). Mn/DOT plans in 2004 to <br />rebuild Ramsey Blvd. traffic signals, and extend turn lanes. We do not believe that this <br />modest improvement will solve the deterioration in level of service that is likely to occur <br />at this intersection once the Town Center development is complete. Further, in 2005, <br />Mn/DOT plans to upgrade traffic signals, and extend TH 10 turn lanes serving the <br />Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW intersection. Again, we do not believe that these improvements, <br />even though they are clearly needed, will provide a complete solution for the existing, <br />and likely future traffic congestion at this intersection. Since there is no imminent plan <br />for major improvements to these intersections, such as the construction of interchanges, <br />we need to work together with the City and County to find ways of providing additional <br />roadway transportation infrastructure that will add capacity to these intersections in <br />advance of further development. We would like to work with the City of Ramsey to <br />explore additional funding for local and regional roadway improvements as well as <br />initiatives that restrict the size and intensity of developments to ensure that a certain <br />minimum level of service is maintained. Such initiatives might include binding <br />agreements with developers where additional or increased intensity of development will <br />only be allowed with necessary roadway improvements that maintain an acceptable level <br />of service. Mn/DOT contacts are given. <br />Response: The AUAR acknowledges these traffic problems on page 21-7 by noting that <br />the project traffic would cause intersections in the project vicinity on TH 10 to deteriorate <br />to Level of Service F conditions and further notes on page 21-8 that improvements <br />beyond those described by Mn/DOT will be necessary to achieve acceptable operations at <br />these locations. <br />Relative to the need for cooperation in the pursuit of funding, the City of Ramsey is <br />pursuing federal demonstration funding and is working to secure official mapping of the <br />lands between the railroad and TH 10. This is in anticipation of accelerating the TH 10 <br />Interregional Corridor (IRC) improvements that would provide for interchanges at three <br />locations along TH 10 in Ramsey. The City and the project sponsor have initiated <br />discussions with Anoka County and Mn/DOT to: evaluate phasing requirements for the <br />suggested transportation mitigation; and explore funding strategies for the mitigation that <br />include reimbursement mechanisms to allow the project to accelerate various elements of <br />regional roadway improvements that would ultimately be programmed via the regional <br />transportation planning process. <br />Comment 6.2: On page 17-10, the AUAR shows an increase in the run-off rate to <br />Mn/DOT Right of Way. The run-off to Mn/DOT Right of Way must not be increased, <br />and drainage patterns must be perpetuated. The development will probably need a <br />drainage permit. When the final AUAR is submitted, it should be accompanied by <br />drainage area maps, and storm drainage maps, and computations for 10-year and 100- <br />34-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.