My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:23:20 PM
Creation date
3/22/2019 10:45:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/26/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment 6.4: As a reminder, Ramsey Blvd. is County State Aid (CSAH) Route 56. <br />Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW is CSAH Route 57. Any work on a CSAH route must meet State <br />Aid rules and policies. Also, the County must review any changes to its County State <br />Aid system so that they stay within its system limits. Please note that both CSAH 56, and <br />CSAH 57 are within Anoka County's jurisdiction and the County must have the <br />opportunity to review and comment on the proposed development as well. Information <br />sources on State Aids rules and policies, and a Mn/DOT contact are given. <br />Response: The AUAR notes in Section 21 that several roadways affected by project <br />traffic are State Aid roadways. The City and project sponsor are currently working with <br />the County to address the County and State requirements for roadway construction. All <br />pertinent rules, policies and reviews will be followed. <br />Comment 6.5: Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three complete copies of <br />plats and two copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to submit <br />these when a project is initiated will lead to delay. This is offered as advisory comment. <br />Response: Advisory comment acknowledged. <br />Comment 6.6: In Appendix B, please re -check the traffic assignments in Figures 7 and <br />8. For example, in Figure 8 (PM), the difference in the through volumes (for with, and <br />without project) on westbound TH 10 at Sunfish Lake Blvd. NW is 1,065 (3,165 - 2,100). <br />This number also represents the traffic entering the development in the afternoon (PM) <br />from the east on TH 10 (43 percent of 2,480). If the differences in the Left Turns, and <br />Right Turns at Ramsey Blvd. and Armstrong Blvd. NW are added, the result is 779. It <br />appears that there is no accounting for 286 vehicles. These figures must be double- <br />checked for accuracy, and any revised traffic information submitted to Mn/DOT (contact <br />given). <br />Response: The turning movement assignments in Figures 7 and 8 of Appendix B have <br />been rechecked. The westbound through movement at Sunfish Lake in the PM peak has <br />been adjusted from 3,165 vehicles to 2,865 as shown in Revised Figure 8 (Attachment 1 <br />at the end of this response document) to account for 300 inbound (to the project) vehicles <br />that are assigned to use Sunfish Lake Boulevard to reach Industry Avenue. Of the 300 <br />vehicles in this revision, 100 were assumed to use Sunfish Lake Boulevard and are <br />included in the 418 vehicles assigned to the westbound right turn at Sunfish Lake <br />Boulevard. The other 200 vehicles are assigned to the westbound through movement on <br />Industry Avenue at Sunfish Lake Boulevard. <br />The turning movements in original Figure 8 on Sunfish Lake Boulevard and Industry <br />Avenue included these vehicles and are not revised. Revised Figure 8, when compared to <br />original Figure 5 (the future base traffic assignment), shows that 765 vehicles would enter <br />the project from TH 10 east of Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The incremental difference in <br />traffic turning right onto Ramsey and Armstrong Boulevards is 772. The difference <br />between the two numbers is the result of rounding up during calculations made by the <br />Traffix (computer modeling) program as it makes the incremental assignments from the <br />multiple zones within the project site. Four additional pages of Appendix B are revised to <br />account for this adjustment in traffic volumes: future with project (no mitigation) <br />34-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.