Laserfiche WebLink
Currently, as pointed out in Item 17 of the AUAR, there is no discharge from the RTC site <br />to the Mississippi River. Revisions within Item 17 in the AUAR document and the added <br />Appendix J discuss the means that are proposed to handle runoff from the RTC site under <br />some new drainage area and outlet assumptions. Negotiations on outlet <br />alignment/character and further consideration of outlet options continue. The discussion of <br />the drainage system does not include details on the specific BMPs that will be introduced <br />into each block as they are constructed. The AUAR document looked instead at the overall <br />need to address drainage under high flow conditions, and route that water such that <br />flooding problems do not occur. This approach is required by the LRRWMO. Follow-up <br />implementation of BMPs to enhance infiltration, filtration and detention will be a design <br />detail that will likely lead to additional reduced runoff. Appendix J was developed after the <br />release of the draft AUAR document in response to discussions with the County about the <br />nature of the drainage outlet from TH 10 to the River. Details on runoff minimization <br />BMPs will be an element of design as the project develops. Please refer also to responses <br />for Comments #3, 7.13 and 12.10. The comment on outflow elevations is acknowledged. <br />Comment 7.4: The document accurately indicates that DNR Water Appropriation permit <br />No. 85-6005 will need to be amended as additional wells are added to increase the <br />municipal water supply due to the added development. It also mentions that monitoring <br />of the surficial aquifer is recommended to determine more accurately whether there is an <br />effect on the water table by withdrawals from the Franconia -Ironton -Galesville aquifer. <br />Some form of monitoring will likely be a requirement of the permit process. <br />The statement of page 13-8 that the "wetlands in question experience natural drying <br />during periods of low precipitation. The photographic history... shows wetland in the <br />vicinity of the RTC site disappearing during the mid to late 1980s, which is prior to the <br />development of the municipal wells. This same phenomenon occurs again in the mid to <br />late 1990s and prior to the installation of wells 4 and 5" contradicts the statement on page <br />12-4 that "...photographic analysis showed that for the period 1981 through 1996, the <br />acreage of wetlands remained fairly constant. Beginning in 1997, however, the acreage <br />of wetlands visible on the aerial photography declined sharply." <br />Response: The discussion in "Groundwater -Surface Water Interaction and Wetland <br />Impacts" in Item 12 has been modified to address the comments. <br />Comment 7.5: The document lacks discussion of water conservation in the new <br />development. The DNR would like to know if "low water use" landscaping would be <br />used to minimize irrigation, as well as whether flow restrictors, watering bans, or other <br />water conservation measures will be promoted. <br />Response: To reduce peak water usage in areas served by the municipal water system, <br />the City of Ramsey has implemented an odd/even day sprinkling ban, pursuant to City <br />Code 4.40.06 subd. 10. Residents may water on odd numbered days if your address ends <br />in an odd number, and on even numbered days if your address ends in an even number. <br />The sprinkling restriction includes no watering between 10:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. since a <br />significant amount of water is lost due to evaporation during the hot portions of the day. <br />Homeowners with automated systems are strongly encouraged to program them to <br />34-9 <br />