Agenda - Council - 02/26/2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Additionally, per comment #12.1 from the Metropolitan Council, the request for change has been approved. The text has been revised to the following: "The change in the functional class on these roadways to A Minor Arterial is in anticipation of this increased regional role." Comment 8.5: Transit facility improvements are welcome at this location, both for the Northstar Corridor and for bus transit connections. We encourage participation by the City and developer in continued coordination with the County's systems (Anoka Traveler and Northstar), as well as coordination with Metro Transit, for future services and facilities. Response: The City of Ramsey has requested a station stop at the Ramsey Town Center from the Northstar Corridor Development Authority (see also the Metropolitan Council Comment #12.3). Provision is made within the project for a park and ride facility to be used initially for the Northstar Coach service and ultimately for the commuter rail service. The project sponsor has authorized preparation of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan for the project site that includes elements to encourage transit use by project residents, employees and visitors. Comment 8.6: We recommend implementation of travel demand management (TDM) program as part of the overall development. Discussions should be held and plans made with the County and others relating to TDM activities before development plans are finalized. The discussion should include how the activities will be prioritized, funded, maintained, etc. Response: See previous response. The TDM plan for the site will consider mechanisms for coordinating with the proposed Transportation Management Organization (TMO) in development by Anoka County, as well as coordination with Metro Commuter Services programs. Comment 8.7: There is a listing of recommended improvements to roads and intersections within the County roadway system listed in item 21 of the AUAR; however there is no discussion of how these improvements will be funded or the timing of the improvements. We recommend the City and developer work these issues out in coordination with the County at early stages of the plan development prior to final approvals. Response: See response to Mn/DOT Comment #6.13. Comment 8.8: The AUAR discusses compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan; however, there are compatibility concerns with the County's Transportation Plan, specifically with respect to the CIP and financing of needed improvements. It will be important to collaborate with County staff on the timing and financing of improvements to the County road system. Response: See response to Mn/DOT Comment #6.1. Comment 8.9: There is discussion of the impact on municipal infrastructure, including public -street extensions, but there is no reference to the impact on the County Road system. 34-13