Laserfiche WebLink
Center development and the future park development, particularly where the two projects <br />will interface e.g. lighting, site furnishings, landscaping, etc. <br />Response: The comment is acknowledged, and discussions on this have begun between <br />the City and the RTC design team. <br />Comment 8.17: With the discussion of the City's water supply system and potential <br />contaminant sources, this section should include discussion of the vulnerability of the <br />City's wells and wellhead protection areas. The Minnesota Department of Health has <br />determined that Ramsey wells 1 and 2 are not vulnerable to contamination and wells 3 <br />and 4 are vulnerable to contamination. A formal well vulnerability assessment has not <br />been completed for Well 5. We believe that Ramsey well 5 will also be classified as <br />vulnerable to contamination. When the 10-year time of travel capture zone is determined <br />for well 5 we believe that the wellhead protection area will be extended to the south. <br />Response: The Wellhead Protection section of Item 13 and page 19-2 of the document <br />has been changed to reflect the comment. <br />Comment 8.18: It is our opinion that the AUAR has not provided adequate emphasis on <br />the fact that this site is located within a City wellhead protection area. That the City is in <br />the process of preparing and implementing a plan to protect the immediate groundwater <br />resources (10 year time of travel capture zone) used for the municipal drinking water <br />supply. And, that the wellhead protection plan must address potential contaminant <br />sources because the FIG wells are determined to be vulnerable to surface spills and leaks. <br />Recommendations (of the commenter): <br />1. Discussion of the well vulnerability and wellhead protection area <br />vulnerability should be included in this section and its impact on <br />development of the site. However, this section should not preempt the <br />wellhead protection planning or program activities of the City by <br />addressing potential contaminant sources as a means to protect the City's <br />water supply wells. <br />2. The AUAR should determine whether additional municipal wells are <br />planned for the site. If additional wells are planned on, or near, the site the <br />AUAR should address this. <br />3. The AUAR should discuss the timeline and necessity of determining the <br />vulnerability of Ramsey well 5 and its potential impact on development <br />within this site. <br />Response: Changes have been made in Items 13, 19 and 20 to reflect these comments. <br />Reference is made to Appendix F, where future appropriations are also addressed. The <br />City's planned update of its water supply plan will address the location and timing of new <br />facilities associated with the RTC site. <br />Comment 8.19: The AUAR does not accurately summarize information on the geologic <br />hazards and soil conditions in Item 19. The shallow water table, non -continuous clay <br />34-16 <br />