My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/13/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 01/13/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:16:57 AM
Creation date
4/24/2019 12:22:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
01/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Johns stated as important as Trott BrOok trail is to them, this abuts County Road five and <br /> she thought there should be a trail along there. <br /> The Commission thought there did not need to be additional park space in the development <br /> except along Trott Brook, where it may or may not be needed beyond the trail corridor. <br /> Otherwise, they would want to see additional trails. <br /> Civil Engineer II Linton explained there were comments from the floor at the City Council <br /> meeting that there should be a park in the development because of the: density of the <br /> development. <br /> Chair Johns noted she would not be entirely opposed to a neighborhood park but the first priority <br /> would be to do Trott Brook. She would rather see lesser density and create some green space <br /> that way. <br /> Commissioner Ostrum stated he would be in favor of providing ways to the main parks than to <br /> put a tot lot in the development. <br /> Commissioner Shryock concurred and stated they have very nice parks in the City and she <br /> thought it would be wise to get trails installed to provide access to the parks. <br /> Parks/Utilities Supervisor Riverblood stated there is nothing preventing the Commission or <br /> Council from considering private green space. <br /> Commissioner Shryock stated at this time she would not recommend putting in a neighborhood <br /> park but in the future if density continues at this size to the north, they may want to consider a <br /> neighborhood park further north. <br /> Commissioner Ostrum thought it would be better to provide more green space than what is <br /> provided in the development at this time. <br /> Case #3: Sketch Plan Review for Alpine Woods 2nd Addition <br /> Civil Engineer II Linton explained Oakwood Land Development has submitted a sketch plan to <br /> re-plat 5 lots to 7 lots in Alpine Woods Addition. This development is west of Sunfish Lake <br /> Boulevard and north of Alpine Drive. <br /> The developer had anticipated keeping an existing house and incorporating it into the <br /> development, however, the plans have changed and the house will be removed.: The developer <br /> paid cash for the first addition park dedication. The park dedication for the two additional lots <br /> should be accepted in cash at the 2005 rates. The 2005 rates are $2200/lot for park and $550/lot <br /> for trail. A trail along Sunfish Lake Boulevard was not requested in the original platting. <br /> Construction of this trail should also be required at this time. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Ostruin, seconded by Commissioner Shryockto recommend <br /> acceptance of park dedication of$4,400.00 and trail fees of$1,100.00. <br /> Park and Recreation Commission/January 13, 2005 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.