Laserfiche WebLink
Principal City Engineer Olson replied that that was correct. The project would have to come <br />back to the Council for approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that it was important to have the City Attorney involved with <br />drafting appropriate documents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson inquired if the City's sewer and water comprehensive plan would have <br />to be updated before anything was done. <br /> <br />Principal City Engineer O lson replied t hat i n order for t hem t o take a good look at what the <br />system will look like after the project it would be beneficial. The sewer has already been <br />anticipated to go up to the Trott Brook, but staff has also had conversations with property owners <br />north of the Trott Brook. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to recommend that the <br />City Council authorize staff to hire Bolten and Menk at a cost not to exceed $8,500 for <br />completing a feasibility study for extending urban services to the property identified, contingent <br />upon an escrow being set up to cover all expenses including staff time, the City not being held <br />liable, amendment to the sewer and water comprehensive plan, and the City not having any <br />liability to cover the feasibility study by drafting a contract with the City Attorney, and contacting <br />the MPCA regarding lead contamination standards. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if staff knew the City Attorney's <br />opinion on the issue. Councilmember Kurak replied no. Councilmember Zimmerman inquired <br />as to who would be liable for the cost if nothing happens. Mayor Gamec replied that they will <br />make sure there is no obligation to the City if the project is not deemed practical. <br />Councilmember Elvig noted that he was going to abstain from voting. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Cook, Kurak, Pearson, <br />Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Abstained: CouncilmemberElvig. <br /> <br />Case #4: 2003 Street Maintenance Program <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that since 1981, the City of Ramsey has conducted an Annual <br />Street Maintenance Program, whose purpose was to address the preventative maintenance of the <br />City's asphalt pavements. The history of the City's paved streets and their maintenance is <br />summarized on the attached table. From 1981 until 1990, the program consisted predominantly <br />of sealcoating and the full cost of the program was special assessed. Beginning in 1991 until the <br />present time, the City has financed 50% of the program cost. Because of the City Charter <br />requirements, it is necessary to initiate the program in January in order to allow sufficient lead- <br />time for construction to take place in early summer. The frequency of preventative maintenance <br />on the City's bituminous pavements has varied considerably, with some pavements receiving a <br />sealcoating as little as two years and others as much as ten years after initial construction. In <br />general, however, o ur current goal is to sealcoat a new bituminous pavement five years after <br />construction and readdress maintenance at seven years thereafter. Currently, whenever possible <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/January 21, 2003 <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />