My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 11/03/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 11/03/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:56:09 PM
Creation date
5/13/2019 10:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/03/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Amendment. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br /> <br />nd <br />Nichole O’Connell, 5590 152 Lane, stated Associate Planner Geisler informed her that a petition <br />would do no good, so she did not get one. She has a major issue with there being a through <br />ndnd <br />street at 152 Lane. She understands the sanitary sewer will be located north of 152 Lane, but <br />that does not constitute having to put a street through. She has a major concern for the safety of <br />the children in this neighborhood. The children have to walk in the streets to get to their friends <br />houses, and it has not been a concern, but a through street would put children in jeopardy of cars. <br />nd <br />She does not want to upset people on 152 Avenue, but there are a fraction of the homes on that <br />street that would be affected, and the street in that location would be a great access for Highway <br />47. She stated she welcomes new neighbors and a new school, and she would love a park, but to <br />open the street would be a major concern. She just moved onto the cul-de-sac this year and <br />cannot imagine having it any other way. She does not see a need for the access until possibly in <br />the future if there is a school built. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy explained the Commission is concerned about safety in the <br />neighborhoods as well. The Police Chief and Fire Chief are concerned that there should be more <br />than one access to an area if there is an accident or incident that blocks a road. He drove the <br />streets in this neighborhood and there is no other access into this neighborhood. That is a concern <br />and a reason the Commission would look at trying to connect the road. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Connell stated for the last seven or eight years there has only been one access into the <br />neighborhood and it has not been an issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if a sidewalk being installed would address some of Ms. <br />O’Connell’s concerns. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Connell replied a sidewalk or a park would address concerns. <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson stated he can sympathize with Ms. O’Connell. For the first seven years he <br />lived in Ramsey they lived on a dead end street. When the land was developed next to them they <br />had these same concerns. One of the things that seemed to help was sidewalks being installed. <br />Once the road went through they realized their concerns were not as magnified as they thought <br />they would be. He asked if Ms. O’Connell would be more in favor of the road if sidewalks were <br />installed. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Connell replied she would like things like sidewalks, speed bumps, slowing signs, and a <br />park. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated in the case of Commissioner Watson’s neighborhood, the <br />sidewalk was funded through the City’s sidewalk fund. This is not the only way it could be <br />funded. Sidewalks could be included in the development agreement for a plat. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission/November 3, 2005 <br />Page 12 of 27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.