My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/28/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 05/28/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:29:41 PM
Creation date
6/17/2019 4:10:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/28/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
300
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma mentioned that with the Ramsey Foundation, the organization, is moving <br />the responsibility for planning the concerts to the City. He noted that would be part of the event <br />planning for the City employee. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill reviewed the Strategic Plan initiatives specific to the <br />community development department. He noted that they would like to be more collaborative in <br />improving the image and aesthetic of Highway 10 and Highway 47. He stated that they are in the <br />midst of updating the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that community development would assume <br />the licensing duty from the City Clerk, because the department is already involved in that aspect <br />He reviewed the desired customer service metrics for the community development department, <br />noting that the department is doing well. He reviewed the staffing plan metrics for the next few <br />years and the variables that can impact those staffing levels. He stated that there is a high level of <br />new developments and a desire to review proposals quicker. He stated that in the next 20 years <br />the City is expected to continue to grow in households, population and staffing needs. He reviewed <br />some of the duties that the community development department is currently involved in. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that there is a need right now while the City is in the growth phase, <br />noting that the need has been mitigated in the past few years with the use of consultants. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that he anticipates the rapid growth rate for the <br />next decade or two. He agreed that the gap could be filled with the use of consultants but noted <br />that it is then difficult to pair that use of consultants with the ability to provide rapid response to <br />questions. He noted that consultants also have a higher hourly rate. He stated that clients are often <br />not pleased to wait one to two weeks for a response from the consultant and therefore believes it <br />would be helpful to have a full-time position added that would be able to help address the workload <br />and be able to provide customer service. <br />Councilmember Riley asked if the permit revenue is already budgeted into the projection. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill stated that they attempted to better estimate the permit <br />revenue but noted that there was a large swing that occurred. He stated that he would prefer to err <br />on the side of caution rather than attempting to forecast too high and scramble to cut items during <br />the budget year. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked why a senior planner would be needed rather than a lower level <br />planner. <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that there would be a high rate of turnover for a <br />lower level planner. He stated that the Council has made the statement that they would like to <br />create a collaborative effort to address code enforcement rather than through violations. He stated <br />that the experience that a senior planner would bring would assist in that environment and would <br />help to prevent that turnover that an assistant planner would bring. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that the position classified as new in the budget, but noted that there <br />currently is an employee that splits time between engineering/public works/parks. He noted that <br />the employee has taken on the duty of parks reservation and therefore the ability for that employee <br />City Council Work Session / July 11, 2017 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.