Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Anderson stated that he did not think any absolute concerns would be identified by <br />the DNR related to this request. He stated that perhaps a comment would be made to offset the <br />building with additional plantings, which is already recommended by staff. He noted that the City <br />has not yet received input from the DNR but is basing his comments on past experience from the <br />DNR with similar requests. <br />Councilmember Shryock asked if there should be a consideration of requesting an evergreen <br />planting between the new building and the neighboring property. <br />Board Member Moore stated that she would be concerned with adding additional plantings in the <br />bluff area, because of the existing tree locations. She stated that perhaps the applicant could work <br />with a Master Gardener from Anoka County to determine if additional plantings would be <br />appropriate or harmful to the river. She stated that she does support the request for an additional <br />evergreen planting between the building and neighboring property. <br />Chairperson Valentine stated that perhaps there should be a more professional input regarding the <br />request for additional plantings. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that personally he does not see a concern with space between the <br />building and the existing tree line, however, the recommendation could be to fill in more of the <br />gap along the shoreline to provide additional screening of structures in general. He believed that <br />in-house there are resources and capabilities to visit the site and determine if there is sufficient <br />space for trees to survive. He stated that if there is not sufficient space for a tree to survive, he <br />would then not support adding trees in that location. <br />Motion by Board Member Fetterley and seconded by Board Member Hiatt to recommend the <br />Planning Commission approve the requested variance contingent upon the applicant planting <br />additional native trees between the accessory building and the river if there is space as determined <br />by a site visit by Staff. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Valentine, Board Member Fetterley, Hiatt, Bernard, and <br />Moore. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Covart and Madison. <br />5.03: Review Preliminary Plat for Property at 6080 Highway 10 NW (Project No. 18-163); <br />Case of Village Bank <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. He stated that the purpose of this case is to <br />review a Preliminary Plat for a subdivision of the property located at 6080 Highway 10 NW. The <br />subject property is currently zoned both R-1 Residential and E-1 Employment. The Preliminary <br />Plat shows 14 detached villa lots plus three outlots that will contain the storm water pond, <br />infiltration basin, and trail (part of the Mississippi River Trail). A Comprehensive Plan <br />amendment and zoning amendment will be required based on the proposed use, lot dimensions <br />and density. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that the Council is of the same mind as the Planning Commission <br />and EPB. She stated that there was some discussion on the number of lots, but the Council <br />supported moving ahead with this number of lots to gather additional public input. She noted that <br />Environmental Policy Board / April 15, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />