Laserfiche WebLink
the Council did support the additional density transitioning. She stated that the Council also <br />discussed the pathway between the cul-de-sac and Highway 10 but believed that there is adequate <br />space for that to provide additional emergency only access. She stated that the Council supports <br />this project moving forward and felt comfortable with the comments recommended in the staff <br />review letter. <br />Chairperson Valentine commented that this is a complex and challenging site that will bring in <br />additional regulatory programs. <br />City Planner Anderson agreed that there are multiple complex sets of rules for this development <br />request that must be considered. <br />Board Member Hiatt asked if there was discussion on reexamining the shoreland rules to bring <br />those into compliance with the State or DNR. <br />Councilmember Shryock stated that at the time the Council reviewed the request that information <br />was not yet available. She noted that staff is reviewing the information. She stated that the <br />applicant has been working to apply for grant funds to remove the debris and clean-up the site. <br />She stated that in the end, this development would be a benefit to the neighborhood once all the <br />work onsite is completed. <br />City Planner Anderson stated typically a sketch plan review provides general information, but this <br />applicant had provided additional information in attempt to get ahead of some of the issues on the <br />site. He stated that the tree preservation and landscaping plans were not included and the shoreland <br />regulations were also not taken into account during the sketch plan review and just came to light <br />within the past few days while preparing the case for tonight's meeting. He stated that a review <br />letter was included in the Board packet that addressed the concerns identified by staff. <br />Motion by Board Member Hiatt and seconded by Board Member Bernard to recommend approval <br />contingent upon compliance with the staff review letter. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Valentine, Board Member Hiatt, Bernard, Fetterley, and <br />Moore. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Covart and Madison. <br />5.04: Review Current EPB Work Plan <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report. The EPB has a City Council approved Work <br />Plan for 2017-2019. As the City Council is beginning to wrap up their strategic planning for 2019, <br />staff thought it would be a good time to briefly review the current plan and begin brainstorming <br />topics for future consideration. The intention is not to develop a new work plan this evening, but <br />rather to initiate some discussion on possible topics of interest or importance to the EPB. <br />Chairperson Valentine welcomed some brainstorming ideas to consider further. He stated that he <br />is satisfied with the level of effort that the Board has received from City Planner Anderson. He <br />acknowledged the high amount of work that is placed on staff for some of the Board projects and <br />actions. <br />Environmental Policy Board / April 15, 2019 <br />Page 4of6 <br />