My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 06/11/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:30:07 PM
Creation date
7/12/2019 11:31:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/11/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />W <br />i <br />it Q <br />4°011- <br />Notes <br />Conflict points were counted where <br />crosswalks and sidewalk connections <br />willbe provided. <br />Assume traveling to Holiday Gas <br />Station. <br />Green - adds <60 seconds <br />Yellow - adds 60-120 seconds <br />Red - adds 120+seconds <br />Assume traveling to 143rd Ave at Ebony <br />St <br />Green - adds <60 seconds <br />Yellow - adds 60-120 seconds <br />Red - adds 120+seconds <br />Any impact is a concern because the <br />park is already smaller than the average <br />regional park. <br />Underpass options require a shoofly <br />which impacts the existing Public Works <br />Campus. <br />Underpass options require a shoofly <br />which influences the construction <br />schedule and requires extra measures <br />for drainage. Additionally TH 10 grade <br />change is more impactful to traffic than <br />Ramsey grade change. <br />Discussions with NNSF Railroad indicate <br />strong preference for an overpass. <br />m <br />A l A 6 <br />t i w <br />6 <br />ry <br />1 <br />Dismissed prior to operational analysis <br />= <br />v <br />Dismissed prior to cost estimation <br />n <br />• <br />; m o <br />CC <br />O S <br />ry <br />r <br />` <br />> <br />io <br />w £ 3 m <br />'u y 'u f E <br />1 O 2 O O <br />N <br />w 3 E 1 <br />•ue o F E <br />LL O 8 O <br />LLa 8 m <br />Oo <br />M <br />m a ,. .e <br />w e <br />C f E <br />LL O O <br />�_ <br />d <br />i <br />9full <br />5 partial <br />N <br />A E <br />f R <br />O <br />ry <br />e I <br />N O <br />ry <br />7B I 8 I 9 <br />4=111 <br />oLL <br />r <br />a <br />v <br />ll <br />ry <br />L. <br />G 7 <br />6 <br />m 7 `u N <br />m <br />E <br />- <br />r <br />, <br />m <br />-a <br />a <br />E <br />e m r" <br />-a. <br />a <br />= <br />r v <br />'A- <br />n m <br />.i <br />m <br />r <br />2 <br />r <br />- b <br />m£3r <br />aw IT <br />. u LL E <br />- LL G G <br />O <br />E <br />- <br />o <br />_ <br />' C <br />o f <br />v <br />o <br />w 3 E ` <br />LL O O <br />- <br />w <br />o° <br />- - <br />- " <br />- <br />w a E <br />o« a <br />, <br />a A <br />ry <br />.. <br />ry <br />m <br />a <br />w s e <br />O O <br />:1_ <br />a <br />_ <br />° <br />�_ <br />a o <br />a E <br />v <br />fe <br />£ <br />O <br />ry <br />✓, <br />w <br />• <br />v, <br />L <br />N O <br />ry <br />n-- <br />„ - <br />E o 2rvE«w <br />'� <br />w r <br />a <br />„ E <br />m.i <br />- <br />mmmm <br />- <br />- <br />- <br />o o <br />3 <br />Measures <br />Pedestrian -Vehicle Conflict Points <br />Perceived Pedestrian Comfort <br />a <br />ry <br />a2 <br />ry <br />23 <br />LL <br />,. <br />LL <br />,. <br />Potential Property Impacts' <br />Impact to Regional Perk <br />E <br />: <br />3 <br />C <br />E <br />8 <br />•E <br />o <br />z5 <br />Likelihood of Railroad Approval <br />Agency Support to Carry Concept <br />Forward <br />c = <br />c2 <br />b l <br />; <br />tl <br />a <br />" 1 <br />W <br />tl <br />a_ <br />c <br />W <br />IAMsEYGATEwA Y.%o ti <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.