Agenda - Council - 03/22/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

necessary for them to go forward !with the development of Sweet BaY Ridge, as well as their proposed subdivision'Brookfield, located at~Nowthen Blvd. and 167th. On March 3, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amend.ment for Sweet,Bay Ridge. Comments received at the public hearing included concerns about tra~ffic impaCtS, Opening.up Traprock as a through street, density transition, the outstanding environmental s~dieS,I and site contamination from lead shot. The Planning Commission discussed the request: for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan and raised similar concerns; On a 4-2 vote (1 abstention), the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request~ for ComPrehensive Plan Amendment. Recommendation: The City Council and planning Commission havei met in joint work session twice to discuss the comprehensive plan amendment process. Id¢611y, the City would have completed the Comprehensive Plan rewrite prior to taking action on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests for Sweet Bay Ridge and BroOkfi~ld. Oakwood Land Development has exercised their right to apply for an amendment, therefore the CitY is required to take action on the request in a timely manner, according to State Statute. As stated above, the Planning Commission iha~ recommended denial of the request fora Comprehensive Plan Amendment~ based on the icomments received at the public hearing. If Council is inclined to accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission, then City Staff should be directed to draft a findings and resolution to support that decision. City Staff is recommending approval of the. applicant's request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for several reasons. First, all three of the development scenarios reviewed by the City Council and the Planning Commission show the subject property being developed as Low- Density Residential. Second, because of its size, Sweet Bay Ridge will require an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), which will addreSs transportation, environmental requirements, and water control in greater detail than the comprehenSive plan rewrite. Third, City Staff met with Metropolitan Staff and they' indicated :thai: ',there is currently sewer capacity available t° service property south of Trott:Brook. Met Council Staff is also supportive of the City processing comprehensive plan amendments to accommodate immediate requests for Services and advised the City to submit :the major Comprehensive Plan rewrite later this Fall when regional systems plans are updated. Council Action: Motion to adopt Resolution #05-03- approving the request and authorizing staff to submit the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.to MetropOlitanCouncil. -or- Motion to direct City Staff to draft the appropria~te a resolution to support denial of the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. ~ Reviewed by: Community Development Direct°r CC: 3/22/05 Copies to: City Attorney