Laserfiche WebLink
be required at the time of preliminary plat ~review and approval. The Developer has eonsal.ted <br />with City Staff regarding the tree:Preservatlon plan and some oak wilt control work on <br /> <br />Community Development Direator Trudge°n eXplained a traffic generation a ~ will be <br />required at the time of preliminary plat.reVieW; The sketch plan propose~,~ ~de public <br />access from 3 entrances onto Variolite street, which is acceptable :t~?~he-E'fl~efing <br />Department. Traprock Street is also Pmp0sed to be extended north into:~ iat from Traprock <br />Commons to the south. At th~ time TraProck Commons was pl~tted~;"~Traprock Stree~ W/is:. <br />terminated in a temporary cul-de Sac with the in!e~ntion of eventual ndi~?raprock to <br />the nronertv to the north ~ ~;' ~ <br /> <br />Commumty Development D~rector Trudgeon adwsed th~:;~e proposed plat was reviewed <br />park dedication requirements by !~e Park commission Janua~.~ting. It is anticipated::~? <br />that at a minimum, trail development will ibc r 'eriuir 1 to Vari8 om Alpine Drive to <br />the northernmost boundary of the plat, Another t~,~e~g~t, will.~,beS~-eqa~ed in an east/west <br />direction through the plat to connect the trail/SyStem betwee '~ark a~d Central Park. <br /> <br />Community Development DirectOr Trudgeon eXPlained the City Sta:~i~:[ecommending approval <br />of the applicant's request for ' Plan Amendment fo ~ons. First, all <br /> <br />three of the development " <br />show the subject property beir <br />size, Second, Sweet Bay Rid <br />which will address <br />detail than the comprehensive plan <br />they indicated that there is currea!tlY <br />Brook. Met Co is also' <br />amendments <br />major ;ive <br /> <br />Citizen. Input <br /> <br />th!s <br /> <br />City Council and ing Commission <br />Residential~;Second, because of its <br />Worksheet (EAW), <br />water control in greater <br />Metropolitan Staff and <br />availabi~../[i3 service property south of Trott <br />of the City processing comprehensive plan <br />for services and advised the City to submit the <br />systems plans are updated. <br /> <br /> Mr. John <br />~.profession is a <br />::~.i~i'?H~ S~ted.,he is <br /> ding] ith <br /> inclu e <br /> spaces with:Urban <br /> <br /> Oakwo°d Land Development, stated his <br />builder and ihe worked hard to create quality homes for families. <br /> and issues that are there. He stated different agencies, <br /> feel it is :enVironmentally right to develop these large open · <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated the general eonsensus of the neighborhood is that the area will eventually <br />develop with m~icipal sewer and water. He indicated there will not be any townhomes on these <br />two sites. Hei noted if municipal Sewer and Water is brought to these sites, they have two <br />development'PrOposals at densities that are. less than what the 'ordinance allows for R-1 with <br />municipal Sewer and water. <br /> <br />Mr. peterson stated the neighborhood he !wants to develop is not an example of cramming as <br />many homes as they can on the land. He Stated ihey have spread out the density throughout the <br /> <br /> planning CommisSion/March 3, 2005 <br /> page 4! of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />