Laserfiche WebLink
designates· the subject property as Rural Reserve. Development of Swe~t Bay Ridge ~ith Urban <br />services requires a ComprehensiVe Plan Amendment to change the subject property <br />designation from Rural Reserve tO LOw Density Residential. - <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeoninoted the Planning Commissi0ii' ~e~ewed the <br />sketch plan for Sweet Bay Ridg¢ (aka Gun Club Property) at its January ~65 ~:~eting. At <br />that time, City Staff reported that any decisi°n on the sketch plan ma~prematu;~'.~ ~he <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment}to consider extension of urban services ~ northern ar~a~ ~f <br />the City is still in process. Per .Staff's recOmmendation, action ?, ske~lan was tabiiSC~'} ! <br />until March to allow the City more time tO:work on the !j ~:ve ~]an <br />Community Development Director Trudge°n stated the ~ti -I [anning Commission <br />have met in joint work session twice to !discuss the ' amendment process,;, i!~.? <br />Ideally, the City would have cOmPleted th~ a ' taking action or~ <br />~he Comprehensive Plan Amendment reqUests ifor ~od <br />Land Development has exercise, d their fight to the City is <br />required to take action on the request in a timelY manner, Statute. <br /> <br />Community Development DireCtor Trudgeon advised that Land ~yelopment has <br />applied for sketch plan approval :of S mdge to develop 165' .?S~ single-family <br />residential lots on 102 acres on ~[ known as the St. ony Gun Club <br /> <br />Community Development ' ,e~ is currently located in <br /> <br /> the R-1 Rural Reserve district and the <br /> for development with Urban services, <br /> sketch plan reflects a gross dens!fY of i <br /> with wetlands <br /> standards for <br /> <br /> Communit-y };Development. <br /> proposed:'Platthat will <br /> on the: prehm~n..~ <br /> approved by th'~:ilLm <br /> .... plan also identif <br /> (!(:establiShes a <br />~"~ administration of the <br /> <br /> the property is approved <br /> is 3 units per acre. The <br />density of 2.2 units per acre <br />lots appear to meet urban single-family <br />md. <br /> <br /> there are substantial wetlands on the <br /> with drainage and utility easements <br /> and drainage plan will have to be reviewed and <br />Organization (LRRWMO). The sketch <br />.36 iaCres: of wetlarlds for roads. The Wetland Conservation Act <br />"for. wetland filling. The LRRWMO is also responsible for <br /> <br /> Community 'De~elo Trudgeon explained that because the proposed development <br />will disturb morei!than 80 acres of natUrallY vegetated and forested land, an environmental review <br />is required. An Environmental Assessment :Worksheet (EAW) will be required as a part of the <br />preliminary pla[~.submittal. The ~property has been documented to contain contamination from. <br />"~ :,lead shot. ThiS::~site will need to have the contamination removed as a condition for the approval <br />~iof this plat. :: <br /> <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon stated the current City Code 'requires density <br /> transitioning between the project' area and adjacent rural size lots. A Tree Preservation Plan will <br /> <br /> Planning CommisSion/March 3, 2005 <br /> Page 3 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />