Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt commented-that on the~issue: Of planning, there are studies being done, and <br />consultants have been retained. He stated that duri.'ng the joint meeting they spent over two hours <br />going over consultant reports on how the sewers will connect, and road plans, etc. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director T~dgeon advised that the EAW will look at all <br />those things such as the impact on roads, sCho01s, traffic, etc. He stated this is a preliminary <br />sketch plan, and the Planning Commission is n~t taking any action tonight, but he wanted the <br />residents to know they are listening to the e0ncerns and will continue to work with the developer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer suggested~at th~ slate has a website concerning EAWs that residents can <br />go to for more information. He stated that Whi:le the EAW is done at a City level, it has to <br />conform to State guidelines. <br /> <br />Mr. Stienke stated he sees a lot °feontraCtorS every day that build in a City and then leave, and if <br />there are problems they are already gone. He indicated he. does not want that here. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy noted Sat the questions Mr. Stienke are asking are bigger than this <br />project or the EAW. He suggested Mr~ Stienke take part in the ComPrehensive Plan process and <br />the meeting on February 24t~. ~ <br /> <br />John Peterson, 16735 Nowthen Boulevard,, stated he has been developing neighborhoods for 30 <br />years, and 'is now proposing to :do a major development in the city in which he lives. He <br />indicated his philosophy on the site i~ to create a neighborhood of homes that would be <br />characterized as upscale. He stated he realizes there is a big push for affordability, but this site is <br />not where they would propose that need is met. He indicated they have done a lot of work on the <br />site already with the tree inventory and wetlandlinventory, etc. He stated if Sewer and water is <br />extended, Code would allow up to 200 units on. the site, whereas they are proposing only 165 <br />homes, or about 74% of the maximum allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson 'stated they are not trying to SqUeeze every last unit they can out of this beautiful <br />property, and are giving :more open space than required. He indicated the trees on the site are an <br />issue, and they found a massive outCroPping ofiOak wilt. He stated he has been working with <br />Staff and consultants to contain the oak wilt. He indicated it would be their intention to custom <br />grade the property working with th& buyers in order to save every tree possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson commented that theYhave applied to two sources for financial help to clean up the <br />pollution on the site, one grant through :thel :Metropolitan Council and one through the <br />Department of Economic DevelOpment. He stated they received word they did not get the <br />Metropolitan Council grant. He indicated that :as the developer they are prepared to pay the <br />$700,000 it will cost to clean the site, and have had approved a "Response Action Plan' for <br />voluntary clean-up. ~ <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated he was previoUsly on the .school board, and the reality is that school districts <br />do not build schools in anticipatiolx of students cOming; they wait until the students are there. He <br />indicated that concerning the traffic issUes, they will be studied, and he has already begun putting <br /> <br />Planning commiSsion/January 6, 2005 <br /> page 5 ;of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />